Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Determining heat and mechanical pain threshold in inflamed skin of human subjects
Published on: January 14, 2009
Kyriakos Pavlou1, Antonis Constantinou1, Christos Savva2
1Department of Health Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Abstract:
This study investigates the intra- and interrater reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold assessments in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, focusing on chronic and subacute stages. A sample of 26 adults was evaluated using a mechanical algometer across six anatomical points. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results demonstrated almost perfect reliability for both intrarater (ICC range: 0.96-0.99) and interrater (ICC range: 0.92-0.99) assessments. Standard error of measurement and MDC values for intrarater reliability showed clinically acceptable error, except for the upper trapezius and mid-deltoid, where MDC value exceeded 25% of the grand mean, suggesting reduced precision between nonspecific shoulder pain stages. For interrater reliability, the adductor pollicis brevis, upper trapezius, and infraspinatus also showed less precision, with MDC values exceeding 25% of the grand mean, particularly in chronic patients. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed between the subacute and chronic groups. While relative reliability was high, the findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting absolute reliability, especially for inter-rater assessments at specific muscle sites.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

