Long-term experience with mitral valve replacement: an evolving strategy for prosthesis selection

MVR was examined in 181 patients undergoing 188 consecutive operations during a 12 1/2-year observation time. Hospital mortality for MVR without aortic valve disease was 7 of 156 or 4.5% and was independent of the valve type employed and the presence of coronary artery pathology. Late cardiac mortality in isolated MVR was significantly greater in those patients receiving a Starr-Edward 6120 prosthesis when compared to those receiving an MPX. The presence of coronary artery pathology, however, defines the patient subgroup with the poorest late survival. Tissue durability has not significantly altered late survival after MPX. However, the actuarial analysis of tissue failure reveals important increases in tissue failure incidence 5 years after placement. Although MPX is our prosthesis of choice for MVR, limited tissue durability creates an important subgroup for judicious use of a mechanical prosthesis. We conclude that no valve type should be championed as "the valve" for all patients undergoing MVR. The selection of a valve for MVR remains a difficult judgment which must be tempered by the patients age, history of previous operations, severity of his present illness, and the feasibility of a second MVR.