Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Bronchial Thermoplasty: A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma
Published on: November 4, 2010
Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma in School-Age Children
1Dr. Bacharier is affiliated with Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carrel Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Insights
Biologic therapies offer significant improvements for children with severe asthma, reducing exacerbations and enhancing quality of life. A biomarker-based approach guides the selection of these targeted monoclonal antibodies for optimal treatment outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Severe asthma in children causes significant morbidity, including recurrent exacerbations and reduced quality of life, despite standard treatments.
- Many children with severe asthma exhibit a type 2 inflammation phenotype.
- Biologic therapies, specifically monoclonal antibodies, have emerged as effective treatments for severe asthma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the role of biologic therapies in managing severe childhood asthma.
- To discuss patient phenotyping strategies for biologic selection.
- To summarize efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics in pediatric severe asthma.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on biologic therapies for severe asthma in children aged 6-11 years.
- Analysis of biomarker-based approaches for phenotyping and treatment selection.
- Summary of clinical trial data on efficacy and safety profiles of approved biologics.
Main Results:
- Four biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab) targeting type 2 inflammation are FDA-approved for specific pediatric severe asthma phenotypes.
- Biologics significantly reduce asthma exacerbation rates (27%-59% vs. placebo) with reassuring safety profiles.
- Treatment selection is guided by biomarkers such as blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and immunoglobulin E levels.
Conclusions:
- Biologic therapies represent a significant advancement in treating severe childhood asthma, improving disease control and clinical outcomes.
- A biomarker-driven, phenotype-specific approach is crucial for selecting the most appropriate biologic.
- Ongoing monitoring of patient outcomes is essential for optimizing biologic therapy in pediatric severe asthma.
Abstract:
Children with severe asthma incur substantial disease-related morbidity. Despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and additional controller medications, many patients continue to experience recurrent exacerbations, impaired lung function, and diminished quality of life. Most children with severe asthma demonstrate evidence of a phenotype consistent with ongoing type 2 inflammation. Fortunately, the advent of biologic therapies, monoclonal antibodies that target specific pathways relevant to asthma pathogenesis, has allowed most children with severe asthma to experience marked improvements in disease control and clinical outcomes. Four biologic medications that target various aspects of type 2 inflammation-specifically omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab-are currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in children 6-11 years of age with specific phenotypes of severe asthma. The selection of the most appropriate biologic for a patient's phenotype is driven by a biomarker-based approach, including assessments of blood eosinophil counts, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide levels, and allergic sensitization and total immunoglobulin E levels. These biologic medications have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the rates of asthma exacerbations between 27% and 59% relative to placebo, although they vary in their impact on lung function. The overall safety profiles of these biologics have been reassuring. This review discusses the role of biologics in childhood asthma, including the strategy for phenotyping patients, summarizes the data supporting the efficacy and safety of biologics in this population, and presents an approach for choosing a biologic and monitoring patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Antiasthma Drugs: Leukotriene Modifiers
Leukotriene modifiers work through two distinct mechanisms:
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
Antiasthma Drugs: β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists
One class of bronchodilators includes β2-adrenoceptor agonists. These agents target the β2-adrenoceptors located on bronchial smooth muscle cells. By stimulating these receptors, β2-agonists induce...
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.

