Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
TMJ pericapsular guided injection with visual-inertial odometry (Augmented/mixed reality): A novel pilot clinical
Marco Farronato1, Roberta Crispino1, Massimo Del Fabbro1
1Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Introduction:
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthrosis often requires pericapsular injections for symptom management. Image-guided techniques have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to traditional manual palpation. Augmented reality (AR) integrates digital images into the clinical scenario in real time and proved to be an efficient surgical guide. This pilot study evaluated the outcomes of AR-assisted versus manual palpation for polynucleotides (PN) pericapsular injections in subjects with TMJ osteoarthrosis.
Materials And Methods:
20 condyles (10 patients) with bilateral TMJ osteoarthrosis were randomly assigned to either the test (N = 10 condyles - 5 patients; 53 years old SD 13; 4 female - 6 male) or the control group (N = 10 condyles - 5 patients; 58 years old SD 15; 5 female - 5 male): AR-guided or standard injection site localization following manual palpation. AR-guided injections employed custom visual-inertial odometry (VIO) algorithm, using the condyle's segmented images for precise injection site estimation. Mouth opening, lateral movements, and pain intensity were assessed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), 6 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3) post-injection. Statistical analysis included non-parametric Mann-Whitney test between groups for all the outcomes assessed.
Results:
AR-guided and manual palpation groups showed improvements in VAS scores and mandibular kinematics over time. The AR-guided group demonstrated significant pain reduction and increased lateral movement. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall efficacy. The AR-guided procedure took approximately 120 s longer compared to manual palpation (mean time 343.8 s and 211.2 s).
Conclusion:
The new technique showed clinical efficacy and improvement trends in some clinical parameters such as VAS and laterality, with a reasonable increase in timing compared to the standard practice. This first application of AR can be considered for guided TMJ injections, but further research is needed.
Clinical Significance:
AR-assisted TMJ injections offered improvements trends in VAS scores and lateral movements, making it a promising digitally guided approach for daily practice without the need of direct palpation.
Related Concept Videos
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
Ankle Joint

