Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

220.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
220.3K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

44.1K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
44.1K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

8.3K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.3K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

37.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.5K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Analysis of Expert, Clinician, and Health Care User Interactions With Summary of Findings Tables: Usability Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Evaluation of the determinants of FVIII/FIX levels, bleeding score, and health-related quality of life in the Canadian hemophilia carriers (CHiC) study.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2026
Same author

Author Correction: The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Infection prevention and control measures for Ebola and Marburg disease: a series of rapid reviews.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Retraction and correction of scientific articles due to conflicts of interest: a cross‑sectional analysis of the retraction watch database.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same author

Prioritising measures and interventions to strengthen research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation study.

Research integrity and peer review·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

Publisher preferences for a journal transparency tool: A modified three-round Delphi study.

Jeremy Y Ng1, Henry Liu1, Mehvish Masood2

  • 1Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

F1000Research
|March 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The publishing community desires a journal transparency tool (JTT) that is relevant, user-friendly, accessible, and equitable. This study gathered stakeholder preferences to guide JTT development for improved scholarly publishing practices.

Keywords:
ethics in publishinghealth literacyjournal transparency toolperiodicals as topicpublicationsscholarly publishing

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly communication
  • Publishing ethics
  • Information science

Background:

  • The need for greater transparency in scholarly publishing operations and policies is increasing.
  • A journal transparency tool (JTT) is proposed to provide users with this essential information.
  • Stakeholder preferences are being gathered to inform the development of the JTT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the preferences of the publishing community for the features and metrics of a new journal transparency tool (JTT).
  • To ensure the developed JTT aligns with the needs and expectations of its intended users.

Main Methods:

  • A modified three-round Delphi survey was conducted with representatives from publishing houses and journal publishers.
  • Online surveys in rounds 1 and 2 gathered preferences on JTT metrics and user features.
  • Round 3 involved a virtual consensus meeting to discuss and vote on JTT metric items lacking agreement.

Main Results:

  • Fifteen out of 30 proposed JTT metric items reached the 80% consensus threshold.
  • None of the four proposed JTT user feature items achieved the 80% consensus threshold.
  • Analysis revealed key themes including factors impacting support for JTT metrics and suggestions for user clarity.

Conclusions:

  • The publishing community prioritizes relevance, user-friendliness, accessibility, and equity in a JTT.
  • Findings will guide the development and refinement of the JTT to meet publishing community preferences.
  • This work contributes to enhancing transparency in scholarly publishing.