Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data.

S Greenland, J M Robins

    Biometrics
    |March 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On the asymptotic validity of confidence sets for linear functionals of solutions to integral equations.

    Biometrika·2025
    Same author

    Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables.

    Biometrika·2025
    Same author

    Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models.

    Biometrika·2018
    Same author

    Instrumental variables as bias amplifiers with general outcome and confounding.

    Biometrika·2017
    Same author

    Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

    Journal of the American Statistical Association·2009
    Same author

    Glaucoma outcome studies using existing databases: opportunities and limitations.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same journal

    Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

    Biometrics·2026
    See all related articles

    The Mantel-Haenszel method provides consistent estimators for common risk ratios and risk differences in sparse cohort studies, outperforming other methods like maximum likelihood and weighted least squares under specific models.

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Statistical Modeling

    Background:

    • The Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio is a consistent estimator for common odds ratios in sparse stratifications.
    • In cohort studies, estimating common risk ratios and risk differences is often more clinically relevant than odds ratios.
    • Sparse data presents challenges for traditional statistical estimation methods.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the consistency of Mantel-Haenszel estimators for risk ratios and risk differences in sparse cohort data.
    • To compare the performance of Mantel-Haenszel estimators against maximum likelihood and weighted least squares estimators.
    • To investigate estimators for common rate ratios and rate differences under Poisson sparse-data models.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis under binomial sparse-data models for risk ratios and risk differences.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis under Poisson sparse-data models for rate ratios and rate differences.
  • Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel estimators with maximum likelihood and weighted least squares methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Mantel-Haenszel estimators for risk ratio and risk difference are consistent in sparse binomial data.
    • Maximum likelihood and weighted least squares estimators are biased for risk ratios and differences in sparse binomial data.
    • Under Poisson sparse-data models, Mantel-Haenszel and maximum likelihood rate ratio estimators are consistent and have equal asymptotic variances; weighted least squares estimators are biased. Mantel-Haenszel weighted rate difference estimators are consistent, while weighted least squares are biased.

    Conclusions:

    • The Mantel-Haenszel method is a robust approach for estimating common risk ratios, risk differences, and rate differences in sparse cohort data.
    • Alternative methods like maximum likelihood and weighted least squares exhibit bias in sparse data settings for these measures.
    • Consistent variance estimators for Mantel-Haenszel estimators are available for both sparse and large strata.