Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

6.9K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
6.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

111
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
111
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.1K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

123
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
123
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

7.9K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer among workers.

Annals of the ICRP·2026
Same author

Discussion on ''Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference'' by Susanne Dandl and Torsten Hothorn.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

On the asymptotic validity of confidence sets for linear functionals of solutions to integral equations.

Biometrika·2025
Same author

Change scores and baseline adjustment: splitting the difference (in differences).

International journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Lifetime excess absolute risk for lung cancer due to exposure to radon: results of the pooled uranium miners cohort study PUMA.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2024
Same author

Ensuring valid inference for Cox hazard ratios after variable selection.

Biometrics·2023
Same journal

Individualized dynamic latent factor model for multi-resolutional data with application to mobile health.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Sequential Gibbs posteriors with applications to principal component analysis.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Comparing causal parameters with many treatments and positivity violations.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Leveraging External Data for Testing Experimental Therapies with Biomarker Interactions in Randomized Clinical Trials.

Biometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.2K

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables.

O Dukes1, D B Richardson2, Z Shahn3

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 S9, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Biometrika
|March 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel method to identify causal effects using a negative control population, even when standard instrumental variable assumptions are violated. This approach offers a robust way to estimate treatment effects in complex scenarios.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceSemiparametric theoryUnmeasured confounding

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Traditional causal effect identification relies on instrumental variables with strong, untestable assumptions like unconfoundedness and exclusion restriction.
  • Violations of these assumptions limit the applicability of standard methods in real-world observational studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel strategy for identifying causal effects under violations of instrumental variable assumptions.
  • To develop a robust and efficient estimator for the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT).

Main Methods:

  • Leveraging a negative control population or outcome to relax strong instrumental variable assumptions.
  • Utilizing subpopulations with degenerate exposure and a parallel trend condition for instrument-outcome association.
  • Developing semiparametric efficiency theory for a general instrumental variable model.

Main Results:

  • A multiply robust and locally efficient estimator for the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT) was derived.
  • The proposed method demonstrates potential for causal effect identification even when standard assumptions are unmet.
  • Simulation studies and analysis of the Life Span Study validated the utility of the developed estimators.

Conclusions:

  • The negative control strategy provides a viable alternative for causal inference when instrumental variable assumptions are violated.
  • The developed estimator offers enhanced robustness and efficiency for estimating treatment effects in observational data.
  • This work advances causal inference methodologies with practical implications for epidemiological and biomedical research.