Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Discussion on ''Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference'' by Susanne Dandl and Torsten Hothorn
Kelly Van Lancker1,2, Oliver Dukes2
1Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract:
We comment on the work of Dandl and Hothorn, who propose Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference, a covariate-adjusted method for estimating marginal treatment effects in randomized studies. We discuss their likelihood-based inferential strategy for parameterizing and estimating marginal contrasts and compare this fully parametric approach with established semiparametric methods. We then critically assess its robustness and practical suitability for routine use in clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

