Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Practical considerations when using the covariate-adjusted log-rank test for the analysis of time-to-event endpoints in oncology trials.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Adaptive trial design and interim decision-making using incomplete longitudinal measurements: Methods and application to myasthenia gravis.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Change scores and baseline adjustment: splitting the difference (in differences).

International journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Combining covariate adjustment with group sequential, information-adaptive designs to improve randomized trial efficiency.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables.

Biometrika·2025
Same author

Response to Harrell's commentary.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Discussion on ''Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference'' by Susanne Dandl and Torsten Hothorn.

Kelly Van Lancker1,2, Oliver Dukes2

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Biometrics
|April 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluates a new covariate-adjusted method for estimating treatment effects in randomized studies. The Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference approach is compared to existing methods for clinical trial suitability.

Keywords:
covariate adjustmentrobustness

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology

Background:

  • Estimating marginal treatment effects in randomized studies requires robust statistical methods.
  • Covariate adjustment is crucial for improving precision and reducing bias in treatment effect estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comment on and critically assess the Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference (NAMI) method proposed by Dandl and Hothorn.
  • To compare the NAMI method's likelihood-based inferential strategy with established semiparametric approaches.
  • To evaluate the robustness and practical suitability of NAMI for routine use in clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the likelihood-based inferential strategy for parameterizing and estimating marginal contrasts within the NAMI framework.
  • Comparative analysis of the fully parametric NAMI approach against existing semiparametric methods.
  • Critical assessment of the NAMI method's performance and applicability.

Main Results:

  • The NAMI method offers a novel parametric approach to covariate-adjusted marginal inference.
  • Comparison highlights differences in inferential strategies between parametric and semiparametric methods.
  • Assessment addresses the practical implications and limitations of NAMI in clinical trial settings.

Conclusions:

  • The NAMI method presents a fully parametric alternative for estimating marginal treatment effects.
  • Further evaluation is needed to confirm its robustness and routine applicability in clinical trials.
  • Understanding the trade-offs between parametric and semiparametric approaches is essential for method selection.