Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo
Published on: March 31, 2016
Sedation management and processed EEG-based solutions during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a
Lajos Szentgyorgyi1,2, Samuel Henry Howitt3,4,5, Heather Iles-Smith3,6
1School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road Campus, Broad St, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. lajos.szentgyorgyi@mft.nhs.uk.
Abstract:
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique for managing severe cardiorespiratory failure. However, it is invasive and requires profound analgo-sedation during initiation and often throughout the therapy. Managing sedation in venovenous (VV) ECMO patients is particularly challenging due to the impact of ECMO circuits on pharmacokinetics and specific patient requirements. This can lead to unpredictable sedative effects and require multiple drugs at higher doses. Additionally, sedation is usually managed with traditional scoring methods, which are subjective and invalid during neuromuscular blockade. These uncertainties may impact outcomes. Recent clinical practice increasingly focuses on reducing sedation to enable earlier physiotherapy and mobilisation, particularly in patients awaiting transplants or receiving mechanical circulatory support. In this context, processed electroencephalogram-based (pEEG) sedation monitoring might be promising, having shown benefits in general anaesthesia and intensive care. However, the technology has limitations, and its benefits in ECMO practice have yet to be formally evaluated. This review provides insights into the challenges of ECMO sedation, including pharmacokinetics, unique ECMO requirements, and the implications of inadequate sedation scores. Finally, it includes a brief overview of the practicality and limitations of pEEG monitoring during VV-ECMO, highlighting a significant research gap.

