Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections
Published on: May 19, 2022
Comparing high and low amyloid producers in Alzheimer's disease: An in-depth analysis
Mélanie Leroy1, Anne Laure Aziz2, Susanna Schraen1
1Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, 59000 Lille, France; CHU de Lille, DISTALZ, Lille, France.
Background:
The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/40 ratio has proven to be a more reliable biomarker for amyloid pathology than CSF Aβ42 in Alzheimer's disease (AD), helping to correctly classify patients with positive tau biomarkers (T+) that would otherwise have remained outside of the AD continuum. It was shown that the Aβ42/40 ratio better captures a relative decrease of Aβ42 in patients with high CSF Aβ. However, whether patients with high-amyloid (HiA) AD, in whom A+ is defined by the Aβ42/40 ratio, exactly compare with their low-amyloid (LoA) counterparts, in whom A+ is defined by Aβ42 solely, deserves further analysis.
Methods:
We retrospectively included patients with A+T+ AD and evidence of cognitive and neurodegenerative changes (N+). LoA patients were operationally defined as patients with T+N+ and low CSF Aβ42, while HiA patients were defined as patients with T+N+ and normal CSF Aβ42 but abnormal Aβ42/40 ratio. Tau CSF biomarkers, neuropsychological profile, rates of cognitive decline, structural and metabolic imaging, ApoE genotype and brain neuropathology were compared between the HiA and LoA groups.
Results:
At the time of the lumbar puncture, LoA patients were significantly younger than the HiA patients (68.9±8.7years vs. 71.8±9.4; P=0.0015) and had a lower Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) (18.7±6.4 vs. 20.7±6.2; P=0.0005). There was no difference in the neuropsychological profile nor in the annual rates of cognitive decline between the two groups with early AD. No differences were retrieved between groups on CSF Tau and P-Tau biomarkers, atrophy and brain metabolism, distribution of the APOE4 allele and APOE4/E4 genotype, and neuropathology.
Conclusions:
Overall, our study supports the surrogate use of the Aβ42/40 ratio as an equivalent to Aβ42 to define AD. We showed that HiA CSF profiles were not associated with differences in cognition, brain structures and metabolism, APOE genotype tau CSF biomarkers or the rates of cognitive decline, but may be the associated with later-onset and early-stage AD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining,...
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment

