Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

05:22
Identification of the Genes Involved in Stomatal Development via Epidermal Phenotype Scoring
Published on: January 20, 2023
1.6K
Cryptic variation fuels plant phenotypic change through hierarchical epistasis
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|March 10, 2025
Summary
Cryptic mutations in paralogs within gene regulatory networks can drive rapid trait evolution through complex interactions. This study reveals how these hidden genetic variations in tomato inflorescence architecture lead to synergistic and antagonistic effects, shaping phenotypic diversity.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Evolutionary Biology
- Plant Biology
Background:
- Cryptic genetic variants are hypothesized to be a reservoir for trait evolvability via epistasis.
- Pan-genome sequencing reveals extensive variation in gene families and regulatory networks, including paralogs.
- Empirical testing of cryptic variation has been limited by genetic complexity and phenotypic resolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of cryptic variation in paralogous gene pairs in controlling phenotypic complexity.
- To establish a gene regulatory network controlling tomato inflorescence architecture using natural and engineered variants.
- To systematically analyze genotype-phenotype relationships across a spectrum of inflorescence complexity.
Main Methods:
- Identification of redundant trans regulators forming a network with paralogous cis-regulatory variants.
- Construction of 216 genotypes combining coding mutations and cis-regulatory allelic series.
- Quantification of inflorescence branching in over 27,000 inflorescences to build a high-resolution map.
Main Results:
- Discovered dose-dependent, synergistic interactions within paralog pairs enhancing branching.
- Uncovered antagonistic interactions between paralog pairs, where mutations in one pair reduced the effects of the other.
- Demonstrated how gene regulatory network architecture and paralog diversification shape phenotypic space through hierarchical epistasis.
Conclusions:
- Paralogous cryptic variation within regulatory networks can drive phenotypic change through hierarchical epistasis.
- Gene regulatory network architecture and complex dosage effects from paralog diversification are key to shaping phenotypic space.
- This model provides insight into how hidden genetic variation can catalyze bursts of phenotypic evolution, particularly given the prevalence of paralog evolution.
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis
45.3K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
45.3K
Epistasis Analysis
4.9K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
4.9K
Position-effect Variegation
6.3K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
6.3K
Incomplete Dominance
20.7K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
20.7K
Trihybrid Crosses
22.9K
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
22.9K
Monohybrid Crosses
228.3K
Overview
228.3K

