Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Clinical evaluation and risk factors of head-up tilt test in children
Qiqi Deng1, Shuo Wang2, Yuwen Wang1
1Department of Pediatric Cardiovasology, Children's Medical Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Insights
The head-up tilt test (HUTT) is a valuable diagnostic tool for pediatric syncope. This review highlights key differences in HUTT protocols and risk factors for children compared to adults, aiding accurate diagnosis of unexplained symptoms.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Autonomic Nervous System Function
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- The head-up tilt test (HUTT) is widely used for diagnosing syncope in adults.
- Its application and understanding in pediatric populations are less established.
- Unexplained syncope in children requires reliable diagnostic methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive evaluation of HUTT in pediatric patients.
- To compare pediatric HUTT methodologies and diagnostic criteria with adult protocols.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy, safety, and risk factors associated with HUTT in children.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature review was performed.
- Focused on multi-dimensional evaluation of HUTT in pediatric cases.
- Analyzed differences in tilt angle, duration, and pharmacological use between pediatric and adult HUTT.
Main Results:
- Significant differences exist in HUTT parameters (tilt angle, duration, drug use) between children and adults.
- HUTT aids in diagnosing orthostatic intolerance subtypes and identifying causes of syncope and other symptoms in children.
- Severe adverse events are rare, but include arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and neurological/psychiatric symptoms.
Conclusions:
- HUTT is a crucial diagnostic tool for pediatric unexplained syncope and orthostatic intolerance.
- Understanding pediatric-specific HUTT protocols and risk factors is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.
- While generally safe, potential adverse events during HUTT in children necessitate careful monitoring.
Abstract:
The head-up tilt test (HUTT) is a fundamental tool for the clinical diagnosis of unexplained syncope. While HUTT has been extensively employed in adult populations for over three decades, its application in pediatric cases remains relatively limited. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to perform a multi-dimensional evaluation of HUTT in pediatric patients. This review focused on the differences in methodologies and diagnostic criteria for children versus adults, described diagnostic accuracy and safety of HUTT, and summarized risk factors of syncope events during the HUTT. Notable differences in HUTT between children and adults are evident across various parameters such as tilt angle, tilt duration, and the administration of pharmacological agents. In pediatric patients, HUTT not only helps in determining the subtype of orthostatic intolerance but also facilitates the identification of the etiology of unexplained symptoms such as syncope, sighing, palpitations, chest pain, and abdominal pain. Severe adverse events are uncommon; nevertheless, registered events include different types of arrhythmias or even cardiac arrest, temporary aphasia, convulsions, seizure-like activities, and psychological and psychiatric symptoms. Furthermore, the occurrence of syncope events during the HUTT is influenced by multiple factors including age, sex, height, weight, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hemodynamic type, average hemoglobin concentration levels of creatine kinase activity levels genetic predispositions, multivitamin status among others.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

