Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Establishing content validity of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale
Stephanie Bean1, Rahul Dhanda2, Christina A Graham1
1Patient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, 600 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Background:
This study was designed to evaluate content validity of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS), a patient-reported outcome measure, in adults with anhedonia in the context of major depressive disorder (MDD). To accomplish this, a conceptual model including the symptoms and impacts of anhedonia in the context of MDD was developed and refined through a targeted literature review, clinician interviews (N = 6), and participant interviews (N = 20).
Results:
Using the final conceptual model, an item mapping exercise was conducted for the DARS, demonstrating that it provided suitable concept coverage in this population. Cognitive debriefing of the DARS with participants demonstrated that it was generally well understood and clear.
Conclusions:
Overall, the study established that the DARS demonstrates content validity in adults with anhedonia in the context of MDD. Other measurement properties of the DARS will be evaluated in planned psychometric analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Stereotype Content Model
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia

