Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025
Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Mouse
Published on: October 24, 2018
Low-Intensity vs Moderate-Intensity Anticoagulation for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The
Whitney D Gannon1, Elias H Pratt2, Melissa A Vogelsong3
1Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Background:
Bleeding is a common and sometimes fatal complication of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Whether lowering the intensity of anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO is safe or effective is unknown.
Research Question:
Is a large, multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO feasible?
Study Design And Methods:
In a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized pilot trial conducted at 3 centers across the United States, we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing venovenous ECMO to low-intensity or moderate-intensity anticoagulation. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment rate and adherence to the assigned anticoagulation strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was major bleeding, and the primary safety outcome was thromboembolic events, both assessed between enrollment and 24 hours after decannulation.
Results:
All of the 26 patients enrolled received the assigned intensity of anticoagulation. A major bleeding event occurred in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group and in 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) in the moderate-intensity anticoagulation group (absolute risk difference, -20.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -48.6 to 8.1; P = .33). One patient experienced a thromboembolic event (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group compared with none in the moderate-intensity group (difference, 8.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.3 to 24.0; P = .46). No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events. No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events.
Interpretation:
Our results indicate that enrollment and separation between groups are feasible in a multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation for critically ill adults receiving venovenous ECMO. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed and seems to be feasible.
Clinical Trial Registry:
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04997265; URL: www.
Clinicaltrials:
gov.
More Related Videos
03:40Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:04Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
01:30Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...