Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Assessment of Candidates' Performance Pre- and Post-Adoption of Standard Setting in College Examinations between 2016
Titilope Oyinlola Charles-Eromosele1, Oyenike Oyeronke Ekekezie2, Patrick Ayodeji Akinyemi3
1Department of Training, Accreditation and Monitoring, National Postgraduate Medical College of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria.
Background:
Assessment drives candidates' learning and focuses on the main goals and objectives of the course. Over the years, determination of pass scores in medical education has evolved from the arbitrary 50% to the actual determination of the cut-off scores in the standard setting process in order to make a decision to pass/fail candidates presenting for licensure or credentialing purposes.
Materials And Methods:
The study aimed at assessing and comparing candidates' performance pre- and post-adoption of standard setting in the college. This was a comparative cross-sectional study with a time trend. Examination results of all candidates who registered and sat for examinations in the years 2016-2023 were included in the study. Secondary data from approved results of the various faculties from 2016 to 2023 were used. Data analysis was done using SPSS Version 26.
Results:
There was a statistically significant difference in the mean pass rates pre- and post-adoption of standard setting in the primary examinations (P < 0.001), Part I examinations (P = 0.002) and Part II examinations (P < 0.001) with a higher mean pass rate post-adoption of standard setting.
Conclusion:
The increased pass rates in the primary, Part I and Part II examinations post-adoption of standard setting may suggest improved examination performance. There is, however, the need to assess the acquired competencies and skills of the candidates post-certification. The significantly higher mean pass rates post-adoption of standard setting are consequent on improvement in the quality and robustness of items/questions and of the examination processes, brought about by the training and retraining of faculty examiners which preceded the implementation.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Calculating Standard Deviation
The standard deviation value is small when all the data is concentrated close to the mean. Here the data exhibits low variation. The standard deviation value is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean. Here, the data displays high...
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height...
Regression Toward the Mean