Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

05:52
Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
20.7K
Automated Identification of Stroke Thrombolysis Contraindications from Synthetic Clinical Notes: A Proof-of-Concept
Bing Yu Chen1, Fares Antaki2, Marco Gonzalez1
1Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
|March 17, 2025
Summary
A large language model tool effectively identifies stroke thrombolysis contraindications from synthetic clinical notes, improving accuracy and safety in treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Computational Neuroscience
- Clinical Informatics
Background:
- Timely thrombolytic therapy is crucial for acute ischemic stroke outcomes.
- Manual review of clinical notes for contraindications is time-consuming and error-prone.
- Developing automated tools can enhance efficiency and accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and test a large language model (LLM)-based tool for identifying thrombolysis contraindications.
- To evaluate the performance of the LLM tool using synthetic clinical data.
- To assess the potential of LLMs in streamlining stroke treatment decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Generated 150 synthetic clinical notes with contraindications using LLMs.
- Employed Llama 3.1 405B with a custom prompt to extract contraindications.
- Evaluated performance using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and F1 score.
Main Results:
- The LLM tool achieved high performance metrics: 90.9% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, 87.7% PPV, 99.4% NPV, 98.7% accuracy, and 0.892 F1 score.
- False positives were primarily due to irrelevant or repetitive information, with no observed hallucinations.
- The tool demonstrated robust identification of contraindications in synthetic data.
Conclusions:
- The LLM-based tool shows promise for accurately identifying stroke thrombolysis contraindications.
- Further validation with real-world EMR data is necessary.
- Integration into clinical workflows could facilitate faster and safer thrombolysis decisions.

