Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025
Cell-free Biochemical Fluorometric Enzymatic Assay for High-throughput Measurement of Lipid Peroxidation in High Density Lipoprotein
Published on: October 12, 2017
Interlaboratory comparison of serum lipoprotein(a) analytical results across clinical assays-Steps toward
Alicia N Lyle1, Elias N Flores1, Clark C Coffman2
1Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA (Drs Lyle, Flores, Coffman, Doty, Sugahara, Vesper).
Background:
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent clinical guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a); however, the lack of Lp(a) assay standardization presents challenges to using common clinical decision points. Assay standardization may minimize interassay variability. This improves consistency in CVD risk assessment and evaluations of Lp(a) therapeutic efficacy. Genetically determined size variations in the defining apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein contribute to interindividual Lp(a) heterogeneity. Individuals who express 2 apo(a) isoforms have 2 sizes of apo(a) in circulation, further contributing to Lp(a) heterogeneity.
Objective:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Standardization Programs (CDC CSP) recently launched an Lp(a) standardization program based on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry endorsed liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure (RMP). As part of this program, CDC CSP conducted an interlaboratory comparison study to evaluate current Lp(a) interassay variability and to investigate potential factors contributing to measurement variability.
Methods:
Eight clinical laboratories measured Lp(a) in 40 individual donor serum samples and 3 serum pools. Serum samples were immunophenotyped by Western blot analysis to determine Lp(a) isoform sizes. Sample concentrations were measured in duplicate over 2 independent runs.
Results:
Assay-specific Lp(a) measurements demonstrated good linear correlation with the RMP. Lp(a) interassay measurement variations ranged from 3.3% to 69.1% across individual samples; however, Lp(a) interassay coefficients of variation did not increase in a concentration-dependent manner and were not correlated with Lp(a) isoform sizes.
Conclusion:
This study provides new insights into Lp(a) interassay variability and assay performance in clinical laboratories that will guide future standardization efforts.
More Related Videos
06:47Isolation and Analysis of Plasma Lipoproteins by Ultracentrifugation
Published on: January 28, 2021
11:13Enrichment of Native Lipoprotein Particles with microRNA and Subsequent Determination of Their Absolute/Relative microRNA Content and Their Cellular Transfer Rate
Published on: May 9, 2019
