Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Experimental Approaches to Tissue Engineering
Published on: August 30, 2007
Real-world evidence provides clinical insights into tissue-agnostic therapeutic approvals
George W Sledge1, Takayuki Yoshino2, Joanne Xiu3
1Caris Life Sciences, 4610 S 44th Pl, Phoenix, AZ, 85040, USA. gsledge@carisls.com.
Abstract:
The US Food and Drug Administration approves tissue-agnostic therapies to target tumor biomarkers regardless of tumor type. In light of the growing number of such approvals in recent years, a better understanding of their relative clinical benefit across cancer types is required. To address this need, we analyzed tissue-agnostic indications (TMB-High, MSI-High/MMRd, BRAFV600E mutations, and NTRK and RET fusions) in a database of 295,316 molecularly-profiled tumor samples with associated clinical outcomes data. Here, we show that 21.5% of tumors harbored at least one of the tissue-agnostic indications investigated, including 5.4% lacking a cancer-specific indication. Our analysis reveals poor uptake of targeted therapies for rare NTRK fusions, significant differences in pembrolizumab-associated outcomes across tumor types for TMB-High and MSI-High/MMRd, as well as clinical benefits in tumor types and drugs of the same class not investigated in the pivotal clinical trials. These results demonstrate that treatment effects are not necessarily tissue-agnostic, and suggest possible expansion of therapeutic avenues for a given tissue-agnostic indication.
Insights
Tissue-agnostic therapies target tumor biomarkers irrespective of cancer type. This study reveals variable clinical benefits and suggests expanding therapeutic options beyond initial trial indications for greater patient benefit.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) increasingly approves tissue-agnostic therapies targeting specific tumor biomarkers.
- Understanding the clinical utility of these therapies across diverse cancer types is crucial due to their growing prevalence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the clinical benefit of FDA-approved tissue-agnostic therapies across various cancer types.
- To investigate the prevalence of key tissue-agnostic biomarkers and assess treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a large database (295,316 samples) of molecularly profiled tumors with clinical outcomes.
- Evaluation of tissue-agnostic indications including high tumor mutational burden (TMB-High), mismatch repair deficiency (MSI-High/MMRd), BRAFV600E mutations, and NTRK/RET fusions.
Main Results:
- 21.5% of tumors met criteria for at least one tissue-agnostic indication; 5.4% lacked cancer-specific indications.
- Low uptake of targeted therapies for rare NTRK fusions was observed.
- Significant variations in pembrolizumab outcomes for TMB-High and MSI-High/MMRd tumors across cancer types were identified.
- Clinical benefits were noted in tumor types and drug classes beyond pivotal trial investigations.
Conclusions:
- Treatment effects of tissue-agnostic therapies are not uniformly applicable across all tumor types.
- Findings suggest potential for expanding therapeutic strategies for patients with specific tissue-agnostic biomarkers.
- Further research is warranted to optimize the use of these targeted therapies.
More Related Videos
07:42Patient-Derived Tumor Explants As a "Live" Preclinical Platform for Predicting Drug Resistance in Patients
Published on: February 7, 2021
08:29Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Tissues