Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
Paulo Henrique de Melo1, Anderson Cavalcante2, Jessika Karla Tavares do Nascimento Faustino Silva1
1Post-graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Background:
Previous studies have shown that isometric exercise training reduces systolic blood pressure by approximately 8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 4 mmHg in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. However, the prescription of isometric exercises can be based on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or heart rate (HR) obtained during the maximal incremental isometry test. The reliability and agreement of this test have not been assessed.
Objectives:
To analyze the reliability and agreement indicators of HR and RPE during isometric wall squat incremental tests.
Design And Setting:
A reliability and agreement study was conducted at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Methods:
Twenty-eight healthy subjects (54% men, 26 ± 5 years) performed two isometric wall squat incremental tests. The test began with a knee joint angle of 135° (knee and leg) progressively reduced by 10° at each stage. Each stage lasts 2 minutes or until voluntary exhaustion. The HR and RPE were obtained during the tests. Reliability and agreement were established using test-retest (paired t-test or Wilcoxon test), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots.
Results:
The HR and RPE increased significantly during both tests. The HR and RPE at each stage were similar between the two test sessions (P > 0.05). Both HRmax (ICC: 0.695, P = 0.002, SEM = 8.1 bpm and CV = 5.8%) and RPEmax (ICC: 0.525, P = 0.036, SEM = 0.4 and CV = 3.6%) presented similar reliability indicators, and no statistically significant differences were obtained between the two test sessions (P > 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between HRmax and RPEmax.
Conclusion:
HR and RPE showed similar reliability and agreement during the isometric wall squat incremental test.
More Related Videos
10:21Evaluation of Hydration Status by Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Exercise Stress Test
Published on: September 22, 2023
09:33Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Wearable Devices to Identify Central Versus Peripheral Limitations During Exercise
Published on: December 19, 2024