Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
A tutorial activity for students to experience generative artificial intelligence: students' perceptions and actions.
Nicole B Reinke1, Ann L Parkinson1, Georgia R Kafer1
1School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Physiology students explored generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) risks and benefits through a constructivist activity. Acceptance of GenAI increased, but concerns about academic integrity and learning persisted, alongside rising misconduct cases.
Area of Science:
- Physiology Education
- Educational Technology
- Artificial Intelligence in Education
Background:
- Freely accessible generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) presents significant challenges to physiology education, particularly concerning student learning and academic integrity.
- Existing research primarily focuses on GenAI's assessment capabilities, with limited exploration of educational activities addressing its risks/benefits or students' perceptions and usage patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a constructivist-based learning activity designed to help physiology students critically assess generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).
- To explore physiology students' perceptions, beliefs, and evolving uses of GenAI in their academic work and assessment tasks.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 236 second-year physiology students participated in a 2-year study.
- Students critiqued a ChatGPT-generated exam answer, identifying factual inaccuracies and a lack of depth, followed by discussions on GenAI's role in university studies.
- Student responses (492 posts) were collected via Padlet and analyzed thematically to understand perceptions of GenAI's benefits and risks.
Main Results:
- A discernible trend showed increasing student acceptance of GenAI for learning and assessment over the study period.
- Key student concerns included academic integrity, information accuracy and sourcing, and potential negative impacts on their own learning processes.
- Despite persistent concerns, academic misconduct cases involving GenAI saw an increase.
Conclusions:
- The critical evaluation activity successfully engaged students in understanding GenAI's implications, fostering informed decision-making about its responsible use in learning and assessment.
- The study highlights a complex relationship between increasing GenAI acceptance and persistent ethical concerns among students, necessitating ongoing pedagogical strategies.
- The findings underscore the urgent need for educators to address the evolving landscape of GenAI in higher education to mitigate risks while harnessing potential benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Introduction to Learning
In contrast to learned behaviors, unlearned behaviors such as crying, sexual...
Purposive Learning
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Observational Learning
Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...

