Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Heart Failure due to Coronary Artery Disease
Arushi Singh1, Robert S Zhang1, Sripal Bangalore1
1Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may improve quality of life in heart failure patients but does not clearly reduce mortality or cardiovascular events. Further research is needed to identify specific patient groups who benefit from PCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Revascularization, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is established for acute coronary syndromes.
- The benefit of revascularization beyond guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure (HF) remains debated.
- PCI is recognized for improving angina and quality of life in chronic coronary disease and HF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incremental value of revascularization with PCI in patients with heart failure.
- To assess the impact of PCI on mortality, cardiovascular events, and ejection fraction compared to medical therapy alone.
Main Methods:
- Review of current data and existing clinical trials regarding PCI in heart failure patients.
- Analysis of outcomes including mortality, cardiovascular events, ejection fraction, angina, and quality of life.
Main Results:
- Available data supports PCI for improving angina and quality of life in chronic coronary disease and heart failure.
- Insufficient evidence exists to confirm that PCI improves mortality, reduces cardiovascular events, or enhances ejection fraction over medical therapy alone.
Conclusions:
- PCI offers symptomatic benefits for select heart failure patients with coronary disease.
- Further clinical trials are essential to identify heart failure patients who may benefit from revascularization.
- Optimal revascularization strategies for heart failure populations require further investigation.
Abstract:
The role of revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome is well established. However, the incremental value of revascularization over guideline-directed medical therapy is controversial. Currently available data supports the use of PCI to improve angina and quality of life for chronic coronary disease and heart failure (HF). However, there is insufficient data to support revascularization with PCI to improve mortality, reduce cardiovascular events, or improve ejection fraction over medical therapy alone. Additional trials are necessary to identify HF patients who may benefit from revascularization, and the optimal revascularization strategy for this population.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...

