Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: Retrospective
Noritaka Ozawa1, Kenji Yamazaki1, Nae Hasebe1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan.
Insights
Combining endoscopic band ligation (EBL) with clipping (EBL-C) shows promise for treating colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). This novel method may reduce rebleeding rates compared to EBL alone, with neck formation being key to success.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
- Digestive System Diseases
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) is a significant clinical challenge.
- Current endoscopic hemostasis methods include clipping alone or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) alone.
- There is a need for improved hemostatic techniques to reduce rebleeding rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the usefulness of a novel combined endoscopic band ligation and clipping (EBL-C) method for hemostasis of CDB.
- To compare the efficacy of EBL-C versus EBL alone in preventing early rebleeding from colonic diverticula.
- To identify risk factors for early rebleeding in patients treated with EBL-C.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 138 patients with CDB treated endoscopically from March 2019 to July 2024.
- Comparison of two groups: EBL (n=24) and combined EBL-C (n=56).
- Analysis of risk factors for early rebleeding (within 30 days) in the EBL-C group.
Main Results:
- The EBL-C group showed a lower rate of early rebleeding (8.9%) compared to the EBL group (25.0%), though not statistically significant (P=0.0776).
- Failure of neck formation was the sole independent risk factor for rebleeding (aOR 0.076, P=0.0023).
- Successful neck formation was significantly higher in the EBL-C group (89.3%) versus the EBL group (66.7%) (P=0.0235), with EBL-C being an independent factor for successful neck formation (aOR 7.01, P=0.0095).
Conclusions:
- The combined EBL-C method may be more effective than EBL alone in preventing rebleeding from colonic diverticula by facilitating better ligation.
- Successful neck formation is crucial for preventing early rebleeding.
- Difficult-to-manage diverticula remain a challenge for endoscopic hemostasis.
Abstract:
Clipping alone or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) alone are the main endoscopic hemostatic methods for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). We have established a novel method combining EBL and clipping (EBL-C) for hemostasis of CDB (Endoscopy E-videos); this study evaluated its usefulness. From March 2019 to July 2024, we endoscopically treated 138 patients for CDB at our institution. We retrospectively compared two groups: those treated with EBL (n = 24) and those treated with EBL-C (n = 56). Risk factors for early rebleeding were also examined in the EBL-C group. The rate of early rebleeding (defined as rebleeding occurring within 30 days) was lower in the EBL-C group than in the EBL group, although this difference was only marginally non-significant (8.9% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.0776). Failure of neck formation was the only independent risk factor for rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.076; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.015-0.398; P = 0.0023). Frequency of neck formation was significantly higher in the EBL-C group (EBL-C: 89.3% vs. EBL: 66.7%, P = 0.0235). Undergoing EBL-C was the only independent factor contributing to successful development of neck formation (adjusted OR 7.01; 95%CI 1.41-34.8; P = 0.0095). Previous treatment of the same diverticulum, neck formation failure, and insufficient clipping were risk factors for early rebleeding. Using EBL-C for CDB may be more effective in preventing rebleeding than using EBL alone because it facilitates better ligation of the target diverticulum. Treatment of diverticula that are hard and difficult to manage with suction remains a challenge.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...

