Willingness to Implement Narrative Communication Interventions: Mixed Methods Study Among Breast Cancer Patients and

Oluwaponmile A Odukoya1, Mojisola M Oluwasanu2, Ndidi A Okunnuga3

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

PurposeGlobally, black women experience poorer breast cancer outcomes suggesting the need for effective health promotion approaches to increase perceived susceptibility and improve screening practices. Although narrative communication by patients or survivors is increasingly considered an effective approach for better breast cancer outcomes, there is limited information on its use in Nigeria. This study assessed the perception, willingness and generalized self-efficacy of breast cancer patients and survivors at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, to implement narrative communication interventions.Material and MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study, and a mixed-method convergent parallel design was utilized for data collection. Written informed consent was obtained from each study participant for in-depth interviews and a semi-structured questionnaire. Five patients were recruited for in-depth interviews and a semi-structured questionnaire was used to obtain data from 102 patients. Data were analysed using thematic analysis for qualitative data, and descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data.ResultsThe mean age of the respondents was 49.3 ± 10.2 years. There was a good perception (97.1%) towards narrative communication interventions. Ninety-eight percent were willing to implement narrative communication interventions and 79.4% had a high generalized self-efficacy. Respondents' educational attainment was significantly associated with the generalized self-efficacy to implement narrative communication intervention programs (P < .05). Most of the in-depth interview participants opined that a pre-diagnosis discussion with a breast cancer patient or survivor would have increased their perceived susceptibility and motivation to screen.ConclusionThis study highlights the potential of breast cancer patients and survivors as breast health educators, sharing their lived experiences to empower and motivate women on prevention and screening. Findings could guide the design of population-level, breast cancer prevention and screening interventions.

Related Concept Videos

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation01:25

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation

Several factors are considered while creating a patient's care plan. Motivation is a factor in improving communication, and patients often require encouragement to try different approaches involving significant change. It is essential to involve the patient and family in decisions about the plan of care to determine whether the suggested methods are acceptable. Consider meeting critical comfort and safety needs before introducing new communication methods and techniques. Allow adequate time...
1.8K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:25

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis

The nursing process uses scientific reasoning, problem-solving, and critical thinking to guide nurses in providing patients with appropriate care. This process is a systematic approach to recognize, avoid, and treat current or potential health issues while promoting the patient's well-being.
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...
3.2K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
1.2K
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch01:15

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

The history of therapeutic communication can be traced back to Florence Nightingale, who emphasized the importance of developing trusting relationships with patients. She taught that the presence of nurses with patients results in therapeutic healing.
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
4.7K
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
4.8K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.0K