Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
A Protocol for the Use of Remotely-Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Multiple Sclerosis MS
Published on: December 26, 2015
Dry needling in multiple sclerosis: a scoping review
Abbas Tabatabaei1,2, Farzan Molaei3, Tobia Zanotto4,5,6
1Mobility and Falls Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science, and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Objective:
Dry needling (DN) has recently been investigated as an alternative strategy to reduce muscle spasticity and improve mobility in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The aim of the present review was to identify any available literature on the potential benefits of DN in pwMS.
Methods:
A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Embase/Ovid, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and PEDro databases and at ClinicalTrials.gov. The search results were limited to studies published between 2000 and 2023 without language restrictions. All articles reporting on the application of DN (defined as the use of a needle to target myofascial trigger point(s) without injection) in pwMS were included. Studies related to traditional medicine were excluded. Two reviewers independently investigated the quality of reporting based on Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data on the effects of DN on muscle spasticity, pain intensity, mobility and other reported outcomes in pwMS were extracted and analyzed.
Results:
Four original articles (two case reports and two case series) and one conference paper reporting the findings of a randomized controlled trial randomized controlled trial (RCT) were included. The RCT was small (n = 16 participants) and sham-controlled with no significant differences between groups. In all four case reports/series, reduced spasticity was observed following DN treatment in pwMS. Findings with respect to other outcomes (including pain intensity, mobility, quality of life, manual dexterity and disability reduction) were mixed.
Conclusion:
Although no firm conclusions can be drawn from these uncontrolled case reports/series, DN for pwMS appears feasible and (based on limited clinical observation) may have potential as an adjunct therapeutic method to address spasticity in pwMS. However, the quantity and quality of available data are extremely limited. There is a need for high-quality studies of DN (ideally adequately sized RCTs with a low risk of bias) to further explore its effectiveness in the MS population.
