Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proteomic analysis of dental enamel from 20 Homo naledi individuals shows no male markers.

Cell·2026
Same author

Brain structure and function in Homo naledi.

Brain structure & function·2026
Same author

Genomes of the Golden Horde elites and their implications for the rulers of the Mongol Empire.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Epigenetic Age Acceleration and Hearing Function in US Older Adults.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Meaning-making behavior in a small-brained hominin, <i>Homo naledi</i>, from the late Pleistocene: contexts and evolutionary implications.

eLife·2025
Same author

Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by <i>Homo naledi</i>.

eLife·2025
Same journal

Computational Model for Synthesizing Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess Neuronal Alterations in Aging and Autistic Animal Models.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

Deaf Acoustics: Listening Through Hearing Aids with Thomas Edison.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

Correction: A Structural Equation Approach to Characterizing Growth and Nonlinearity Underlying Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

A Structural Equation Approach to Characterizing Growth and Nonlinearity Underlying Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

Age-dependent Shifts in Spiral Ganglion Neuron Subtypes Are Associated with Interphase Gap-dependent Modulation of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials in Mice.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for A Fractional-Order Model of the Human Ear.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.7K

Developing a Calibration Method to Minimize Variability in Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Joseph Pinkl1,2,3, Tao Shen4, Jinsai Cheng4

  • 1Department of Research and Development, Gateway Biotechnology Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA. jpinkl@gatewaybiotechnology.com.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
|March 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new calibration pulse (CalPulse) circuit improves auditory evoked potential (AEP) measurements by reducing amplitude variability. This enhanced calibration accurately detects age-related hearing loss in mice, improving diagnostic sensitivity.

Keywords:
Auditory brainstem responseCalibrationCochlear synaptopathyHearing loss

More Related Videos

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

16.3K
A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.7K
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

16.3K
A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) are crucial for assessing auditory function.
  • Amplitude variability in AEPs can hinder accurate diagnosis.
  • A reliable calibration method is needed to improve AEP measurement consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an electric calibration pulse (CalPulse) circuit for AEP amplitude measurement.
  • To determine if CalPulse signals serve as a reliable reference for AEP amplitude calibration.
  • To assess the utility of CalPulse for detecting age-related changes in auditory function.

Main Methods:

  • Integrated a CalPulse circuit into an AEP recording setup.
  • Assessed CalPulse signal stability and repeatability in vitro and in vivo in mice.
  • Used sine wave CalPulse amplitudes to normalize ABR wave-1 amplitudes.
  • Compared variability of normalized versus raw ABR wave-1 amplitudes over 4 months.

Main Results:

  • Both square and sine wave CalPulse signals were stable in vitro; sine waves showed better in vivo repeatability.
  • CalPulse amplitudes positively correlated with ABR wave-1 amplitudes.
  • Normalization significantly reduced within-subject variability in wave-1 amplitudes.
  • Normalized amplitudes detected age-related hearing decline at 10 months, unlike uncalibrated amplitudes.

Conclusions:

  • The developed CalPulse circuit effectively reduces AEP amplitude variability.
  • CalPulse provides a reliable calibration reference for AEP amplitude measurements.
  • This method enhances diagnostic sensitivity for auditory function assessment.