Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...
Anatomy of the Ear01:16

Anatomy of the Ear

Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI-Driven Lumped-Element Modeling of Human Respiratory System for Studying Voice Mechanics.

Research square·2026
Same author

AI-Driven Lumped-Element Modeling of Human Respiratory System for Studying Voice Mechanics.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Vocal Fundamental Frequency and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Insights from a Large Multi-Country Cohort in Africa.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

Study of Glottal Attack Time and Glottal Offset Time in Neurogenic Voice Disorders During Sustained Phonation.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2025
Same author

Application of GUHA data mining method in cohort data to explore paths associated with premature death: a 29-year follow-up study.

BMC medical research methodology·2025
Same author

Supraglottic Laryngeal Maneuvers in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia During Connected Speech.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for A Fractional-Order Model of the Human Ear.

Prakash Kc1, Maryam Naghibolhosseini2, Mohsen Zayernouri1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, 428 S. Shaw Lane, East Lansing, 48824, MI, USA.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
|June 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study uses Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) to estimate parameters in a fractional-order human ear model, improving accuracy for hearing diagnostics.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferenceDPOAEFractional-order modelingHuman earMCMCOuter-middle ear gainTransfer function

More Related Videos

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Biology
  • Acoustics

Background:

  • Conventional integer-order models inadequately represent viscoelastic memory effects in ear tissues.
  • Fractional-order elements offer a more accurate approach to modeling ear biomechanics.
  • Bayesian inference provides a robust framework for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate parameters and quantify uncertainties in a fractional-order lumped-element human ear model using Bayesian inference.
  • To validate the model's predictions against experimental data for outer-middle ear gain (OMEG), stapes velocity, and ear canal pressure gain.
  • To establish a foundation for probabilistic diagnostic tools in hearing assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm, specifically the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) implementation, for Bayesian parameter estimation.
  • Utilized previously optimized model parameters to construct informative priors for the Bayesian framework.
  • Computed outer-middle ear gain (OMEG) from inferred posterior distributions and compared with DPOAE measurements.

Main Results:

  • HMC sampling produced well-convergent posterior distributions with quantified uncertainties via credible intervals.
  • The posterior predictive OMEG frequency response closely matched experimental measurements.
  • Bayesian-derived parameters accurately predicted stapes velocity resonances and ear canal pressure gain peaks, consistent with literature.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian HMC simulation approach provides robust uncertainty quantification for fractional-order ear models.
  • The model demonstrates minimal intersubject variability while capturing realistic biological variations.
  • The framework enhances model credibility and supports the development of probabilistic hearing diagnostic tools.