Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

07:28
Microscopic Replantation of Penile Glans Amputation Due to Circumcision
Published on: June 3, 2022
18.3K
Patient-centered outcomes on preparing for and undergoing gender-affirming phalloplasty: a qualitative, descriptive
Nnenaya Mmonu1, Asa Radix2, Elijah Castle3
1Urology, New York University, New York, New York, USA nnenaya.mmonu@nyulangone.org.
BMJ Open
|March 23, 2025
Summary
This study explored patient perspectives on gender-affirming phalloplasty and metoidioplasty. Key themes included goals, sexual and urinary function, mental health, and quality of life, crucial for developing patient-reported outcome measures.
Area of Science:
- Medical research
- Qualitative health research
- Gender-affirming care
Background:
- Genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS) incidence is rising.
- No standardized method exists to evaluate patient perspectives on GGAS.
- Patient-reported outcomes are essential for improving surgical care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand transgender and non-binary patient views on phalloplasty/metoidioplasty.
- To identify key themes in patient experiences.
- To inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure for GGAS.
Main Methods:
- Systematic qualitative study utilizing thematic content analysis.
- Four virtual focus groups conducted with 18 patients (pre- and post-surgery).
- Data analyzed using deductive and inductive coding in ATLAS.ti software.
Main Results:
- Seven major themes and 19 subthemes were identified.
- Key themes included surgical goals, sexual and urinary function, peer support, decision-making, mental health, quality of life, and gender dysphoria.
- Patient priorities encompass functional, aesthetic, mental health, and quality of life outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Phalloplasty/metoidioplasty significantly impacts multiple life aspects for patients.
- Mental health, quality of life, and functional outcomes are critical patient considerations.
- Experiential aspects of surgery, alongside functional and aesthetic results, should be prioritized in outcome measures.

