Comparing the Infection Rates of Strut Versus Straight Plates in Sagittal Split Osteotomies
Stephen E Higgins1, Valmont Desa2
1Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Background:
Sagittal split osteotomies can be rigidly fixated through various methods. Unfortunately, infection remains a common postoperative complication.
Purpose:
The purpose was to estimate postoperative infection rates between strut and straight plates for internal fixation of sagittal split osteotomies.
Study Design, Setting, Sample:
We implemented a retrospective cohort study and included a consecutive series of patients with sagittal split osteotomies performed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The cases were performed by a single surgeon with a chief as resident surgeon. Exclusion criteria included any patient with unilateral surgery, mandibular midline osteotomy, previous mandible reconstruction, distraction osteogenesis, previous facial trauma history, and less than 12 weeks of follow-up.
Predictor Variable:
Primary predictor variable was plate type (strut vs straight). The choice of plate was not based on the surgical plan.
Main Outcome Variable(S):
The primary outcome variable was postoperative infection. This was defined as purulent discharge, incision and drainage, or prescription of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes include hardware removal and neurosensory function.
Covariates:
Covariates included demographics, smoking, alcohol and drug use, single/double jaw, advancement/setback, length of movement, and perioperative third molar extraction.
Analyses:
Fisher's exact test, χ2 test, and Student's t test were computed to measure bivariate association. The relative risks (RRs) and their 95% CIs were reported. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.
Results:
The sample comprised 112 subjects. There were 51 (45.5%) straight plate and 61 (54.5%) strut plate. There were 32 (62.7%) women in the straight plate group, mean age 25.55 ± 13.34 years and 39 women (63.9%) in the strut plate group, mean age 29.02 ± 11.97 years. Postoperative infection was the most common reason for plate removal (n = 10). Strut plates, relative to straight plates, were associated with a 23% increase (RR 1.23, 95%, CI 0.47 to 2.16, P < .7) in infections, a 25% increase (RR 1.25, 95%, CI 0.45 to 2.27, P < .5) in hardware removal, and a 17% increase (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.44, P < .7) in postoperative neurosensory disturbance at 3 months for sagittal split osteotomies.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The choice of internal fixation plate, strut versus straight, was not associated with postoperative infection, hardware removal, or postoperative neurosensory function deficit.
More Related Videos
06:38Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis
Published on: October 12, 2016
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:26Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
01:29Blood and Nerve Supply to the Bones
Nutrient Artery
The nutrient artery is the main blood vessel that enters the diaphysis via the nutrient foramen. While most long bones have only one nutrient foramen, large bones, such as the femur, may have two. This...
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...