Integrating Mendelian randomization and literature-mined evidence for breast cancer risk factors
Marina Vabistsevits1, Timothy Robinson2, Ben Elsworth3
1Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Oakfield 7 House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield 7 House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK; University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter St Luke's Campus, 79 Heavitree Rd, Exeter, EX2 4TH, UK.
Objective:
An increasing challenge in population health research is efficiently utilising the wealth of data available from multiple sources to investigate disease mechanisms and identify potential intervention targets. The use of biomedical data integration platforms can facilitate evidence triangulation from these different sources, improving confidence in causal relationships of interest. In this work, we aimed to integrate Mendelian randomization (MR) and literature-mined evidence from the EpiGraphDB biomedical knowledge graph to build a comprehensive overview of risk factors for developing breast cancer.
Methods:
We utilised MR-EvE ("Everything-vs-Everything") data to identify candidate risk factors for breast cancer and generate hypotheses for potential mediators of their effect. We also integrated this data with literature-mined relationships, which were extracted by overlapping literature spaces of risk factors and breast cancer. The literature-based discovery (LBD) results were followed up by validation with two-step MR to triangulate the findings from two data sources.
Results:
We identified 129 novel and established lifestyle risk factors and molecular traits with evidence of an effect on breast cancer, and made the MR results available in an R/Shiny app (https://mvab.shinyapps.io/MR_heatmaps/). We developed an LBD approach for identifying potential mechanistic intermediates of identified risk factors. We present the results of MR and literature evidence integration for two case studies (childhood body size and HDL-cholesterol), demonstrating their complementary functionalities.
Conclusion:
We demonstrate that MR-EvE data offers an efficient hypothesis-generating approach for identifying disease risk factors. Moreover, we show that integrating MR evidence with literature-mined data may be used to identify causal intermediates and uncover the mechanisms behind the disease.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data


