Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 3, 2013
Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Prostate Cancer In-Basket Messages: Responses From Closed-Domain Large Language
Yuexing Hao1, Jason Holmes1, Jared Hobson1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ (Y.H., J.H., S.H.P., N.Y.Y., W.L.); Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (Y.H.); Department of Electric Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (Y.H.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (A.B., E.L.M., D.K.E., D.M.R., S.S., C.L.H., B.E.B., M.W.).
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of RadOnc-generative pretrained transformer (GPT), a GPT-4 based large language model, in assisting with in-basket message response generation for prostate cancer treatment, with the goal of reducing the workload and time on clinical care teams while maintaining response quality.
Patients And Methods:
RadOnc-GPT was integrated with electronic health records from both Mayo Clinic-wide databases and a radiation-oncology-specific database. The model was evaluated on 158 previously recorded in-basket message interactions, selected from 90 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer from the Mayo Clinic Department of Radiation Oncology in-basket message database in the calendar years 2022-2024. Quantitative natural language processing analysis and 2 grading studies, conducted by 5 clinicians and 4 nurses, were used to assess RadOnc-GPT's responses. Three primary clinicians independently graded all messages, whereas a fourth senior clinician reviewed 41 responses with relevant discrepancies, and a fifth senior clinician evaluated 2 additional responses. The grading focused on 5 key areas: completeness, correctness, clarity, empathy, and editing time. The grading study was performed from July 20, 2024 to December 15, 2024.
Results:
The RadOnc-GPT slightly outperformed the clinical care team in empathy, whereas achieving comparable scores with the clinical care team in completeness, correctness, and clarity. Five clinician graders identified key limitations in RadOnc-GPT's responses, such as lack of context, insufficient domain-specific knowledge, inability to perform essential meta-tasks, and hallucination. It was estimated that RadOnc-GPT could save an average of 5.2 minutes per message for nurses and 2.4 minutes for clinicians, from reading the inquiry to sending the response.
Conclusion:
RadOnc-GPT has the potential to considerably reduce the workload of clinical care teams by generating high-quality, timely responses for in-basket message interactions. This could lead to improved efficiency in health care workflows and reduced costs while maintaining or enhancing the quality of communication between patients and health care providers.Abbreviations and AcronymsAI; artificial intelligence; LLM; large language model; NLP; natural language processing; RadOnc-GPT; radiation oncology generative pretrained transformer.
More Related Videos
03:14Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis