Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

06:52
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
7.8K
Field-based tests for determining critical speed among runners and its practical application: a systematic review
Lucie Lipková1, Ivan Struhár2, Jakub Krajňák1
1Department of Sport Performance and Exercise Testing, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
|March 26, 2025
Summary
Field-based critical speed (CS) testing offers a practical alternative for runners. Reliable results depend on adhering to specific testing conditions, particularly for time trial tests, to optimize training strategies.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Running Performance
Background:
- Critical Speed (CS) is a key physiological determinant of endurance performance in runners.
- Lab-based assessments for CS can be resource-intensive and less accessible.
- Field-based testing offers a practical alternative for assessing CS in real-world training environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and evaluate field-based critical speed testing methods for runners.
- To identify optimal testing conditions for reliable and valid field-based CS assessments.
- To provide practical guidance for athletes and coaches on applying CS testing.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across major scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science).
- Search terms included "critical power," "critical speed," "testing," and "field condition."
- Studies were screened and evaluated for validity, reliability, and applicability of field-based CS methods, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Main Results:
- 19 studies met the inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 450.
- The time trial (TT) test and the 3-minute all-out test (3MT) are the most common field-based CS methods.
- Both TT and 3MT demonstrated high reliability when conducted under specific, recommended conditions.
Conclusions:
- Field-based CS testing is a viable and practical alternative to laboratory assessments.
- Adherence to recommended testing settings, especially for TT tests, is crucial for reliable CS results.
- This review provides a framework for effective application of field-based CS testing to enhance running training and performance.
Related Concept Videos
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
The test works...
Quality Assurance
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

