Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
Published on: January 10, 2013
Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Overactive Bladder Without Incontinence: A Pilot Cross-Over
Michele Torosis1, Lynn Stothers1,2, Crystal Cisneros2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Transvaginal electrical stimulation (TES) effectively treats overactive bladder dry (OAB-dry) symptoms like urgency and frequency. This therapy shows significant improvement in OAB-dry patients, with some responding better based on pelvic floor muscle condition.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Gynecology
- Pelvic Health
Background:
- Overactive bladder dry (OAB-dry) symptoms of urgency and frequency without incontinence are common.
- Transvaginal electrical stimulation (TES) is established for OAB with incontinence (OAB-wet) but not studied for OAB-dry.
- This study investigates TES for OAB-dry symptom management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of an at-home transvaginal electrical stimulation (TES) program for urgency and frequency symptoms in women with OAB-dry.
- To determine if TES can improve patient-reported outcomes and reduce voiding frequency in this population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, cross-over, controlled trial involving women diagnosed with OAB-dry.
- Participants received 4 weeks of sham stimulation followed by 4 weeks of active TES, with a 3-week washout period in between.
- Outcomes measured included standardized questionnaires (OAB-q), voiding diaries, and pelvic floor muscle assessment.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant improvement in OAB-q scores was observed post-TES compared to baseline and sham treatment (p=0.007).
- A significant reduction in voids per 24 hours was noted after TES treatment (p=0.048).
- Positive treatment response, defined as intent to continue therapy, was associated with the absence of pelvic floor tenderness at baseline.
Conclusions:
- Transvaginal electrical stimulation (TES) is a viable and effective treatment for OAB-dry, significantly improving urinary urgency and frequency symptoms.
- The study suggests two phenotypes within OAB-dry: those with pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction who may not respond, and others who benefit from bladder-directive therapy.
- TES offers clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported disease severity for suitable OAB-dry patients.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry

