Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Elective Peripheral Vascular Intervention with Outcomes Among Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Intermittent Claudication.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

Forty years of changes in scientific publishing: from conflict of interest to generative AI.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Coverage Limitations for Use of Urine Drug Testing in a State Medicaid Program.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

From Registry to Reality: Opportunities to Enhance Post-market Surveillance of High-Risk Medical Devices Comment on "Quality and Utility of European Cardiovascular and Orthopaedic Registries for the Regulatory Evaluation of Medical Device Safety and Performance Across the Implant Lifecycle: A Systematic Review".

International journal of health policy and management·2026
Same author

Corporate Vectors of Chronic Disease - Using Internal Industry Documents to Craft Counterstrategies.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Using AI to improve peer review and research integrity in scientific journals.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

Prohibited AI Practices in Healthcare under the European Artificial Intelligence Act.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Probing the Prevalence of Pharmaceutical Corruption.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Regulatory Guidance for the Return of Raw Genomic Data to Research Participants: A Qualitative Interview Study.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Supported Decision-Making and the Inclusion of People who Lack Decisional Capacity in Greater than Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Using Supported Decision-Making to Promote Value-Aligned Research Participation.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Intellectual Disability and Supported Decision-Making in Clinical Research: Anticipating Ethical Challenges.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

31.0K

Research Misconduct and Medical Journals.

Howard Bauchner1, Robert Steinbrook2, Rita F Redberg3

  • 1Boston University, Boston, United States.

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
|March 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Journal editors require a clear process for handling research misconduct allegations like fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. This ensures fair and swift resolution, involving authors, institutions, and funders.

Keywords:
journals and research misconductmisconductresearchscientific misconduct

More Related Videos

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.4K
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

31.0K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.4K
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Research integrity

Background:

  • Journal editors frequently encounter allegations of research misconduct.
  • Research misconduct is defined by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the necessity for a transparent and consistent process for journal editors to manage research misconduct allegations.
  • To detail the stakeholders involved in the misconduct allegation process.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract describes a process for handling allegations.
  • This process involves authors, institutional research integrity officers, and funders.

Main Results:

  • A consistent and transparent process is crucial for timely and fair resolution of misconduct allegations.
  • Retractions may occur for reasons beyond the ORI definition, such as inadequate peer review or conflicts of interest, and still constitute scientific misconduct.

Conclusions:

  • Establishing a standardized procedure for addressing research misconduct is essential for maintaining scientific integrity.
  • The process should be collaborative, involving all relevant parties to ensure fairness and efficiency.