Heart transplant outcomes in restrictive cardiomyopathy: UNOS registry analysis of the last three decades
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Daniel J Miklin1, Eugene C DePasquale2
1North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.
Insights
Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) heart transplant outcomes are improving, with shorter wait times and better survival rates observed in recent years. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for mitigating adverse outcomes in RCM patients awaiting transplantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Medical Research
Background:
- Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) presents diverse etiologies and a generally poor prognosis.
- While emerging therapies exist, their impact on end-stage RCM and transplant outcomes is still under investigation.
- Assessing RCM patient outcomes before and after heart transplantation across different time periods is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the temporal trends in heart transplant outcomes for patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy.
- To compare outcomes in RCM patients across distinct eras: classic (1987-2000), contemporary (2000-2013), and current (2014-2022).
- To identify prognostic factors and survival differences in RCM patients undergoing heart transplantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing registry (n=62,709), including 1157 RCM patients.
- Stratification of RCM patients into three temporal groups: classic, contemporary, and current eras.
- Comparison of demographics, clinical data, and survival using statistical analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox modeling.
Main Results:
- RCM patients undergoing heart transplant were older, with older donors and longer ischemic times compared to non-RCM recipients.
- Overall survival for RCM patients post-transplant did not significantly differ from non-RCM patients, despite increased transplant rates.
- Amyloidosis and chemotherapy/radiation-induced RCM showed poorer prognosis but demonstrated improved survival trends in the current era with shorter waitlist times.
Conclusions:
- Restrictive cardiomyopathy is a significant indication for heart transplantation, with outcomes showing improvement over time.
- Shorter wait times and enhanced survival rates are observed across RCM subsets in recent transplant eras.
- Early identification of RCM is vital for timely intervention and improved management of patients requiring heart transplantation.
Background:
Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) comprises diverse etiologies with overall poor prognosis. Emerging therapies have significantly impacted some of these entities. However, these therapies may have limited impact in the end-stages and have only recently become available. We sought to assess outcomes before and after transplant in the RCM population stratified into 3 distinct time periods from the recent era.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing registry (n = 62,709) for all patients transplanted between 1987 and March 1, 2022, were stratified by RCM status with 1157 patients with RCM. Populations were grouped temporally into classic (1987-2000), contemporary (2000-2013), and current (2014-2022) eras. Multiorgan and repeat transplants were excluded from the analysis. Baseline demographics, listing status, hemodynamics, donor information, and life support methods were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson's tests. Longitudinal survival was assessed via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox modeling and competing outcomes analyses were performed.
Results:
RCM patients were older, female, with older donors and longer ischemic times (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in overall survival compared to the non-RCM population, however, with increased transplant rates. Amyloidosis and chemotherapy/radiation portend the worst prognosis but have shorter waitlist times and up-trending survival in the current era.
Conclusions:
RCM represents a small but significant population of those requiring heart transplant. RCM transplant outcomes appear to be improving across all subsets with shorter wait times and better survival. Early recognition is important to help mitigate adverse outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:54Lung Rapid Recovery Procurement Combined with Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 15, 2022
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care