Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
Published on: January 29, 2014
Modifying quantitative sensory testing to investigate tactile sensory function and behavioral reactivity in children
Jaclyn Gunderson1, Emma Worthley2, Breanne Byiers2
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. gunderson.jaclyn@mayo.edu.
Background:
Sensory reactivity differences are common across neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), however very few studies specifically examine tactile or pain responses in children with NNDs, especially those with communication challenges. The current study aimed to (a) replicate the feasibility of a modified quantitative sensory test (mQST) with a sample of children with NDDs, (b) assess validity evidence based on behavioral reactivity during mQST application and the corresponding behavioral measurement coding system, and (c) explore group differences in behavioral reactivity to mQST stimuli by demographic (sex), clinical (autism status), and behavioral pathology (self-injury) variables.
Methods:
The mQST protocol was implemented and blindly coded across 47 participants aged 2-12 years (M age = 6.7 years, SD = 2.6; 70% male) with NDDs. Feasibility was measured by completion of the mQST protocol and interobserver agreement. Validity was assessed using paired t-tests investigating differences between behavioral reactivity to active stimuli compared to a sham trial. Boxplots were used to visually explore differences in group characteristics (sex, autism status, and self-injurious behavior), with two-sample t-tests used to further characterize differences in SIB group characteristics in behavioral reactivity to mQST stimuli.
Results:
The mQST provided codable data across 91% of stimuli applications with high IOA (84.7% [76.7-95%]). Behavioral reactivity was significantly higher for active vs. sham stimuli. Children reported to engage in self-injurious behavior showed significantly more reactivity to the second half of the repeated von Frey stimulus application compared to children without caregiver-reported self-injurious behavior (M = 6.14, SD = 3.44), t (40)= -2.247, p =.04).
Conclusion:
The mQST is a feasible approach to investigate tactile reactivity in children with NDDs and complex communication needs. The mQST may be useful in understanding sensory variables in relation to developmental and behavioral outcomes such as self-injurious behavior.
