Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Plan complexity and dosiomics signatures for gamma passing rate classification in volumetric modulated arc therapy:
1Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Purpose:
This study aims to enhance gamma passing rate (GPR) classification by integrating plan complexity signature, dosiomics signature, and comprehensive plan parameters, and to validate this method using data from different linear accelerators (LINACs).
Methods:
This study included 235 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans delivered using the TrueBeam LINAC as the primary dataset, along with 47 plans from the VitalBeam LINAC for external validation. The primary dataset was split into training (N = 166) and test (N = 69) subsets. Extracted features included 47 plan complexity metrics, 851 dosiomics features, and 20 plan parameters. Plan complexity score (PCscore) and dosiomics score (Doscore) were derived using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Four classification models were developed by combining PCscore, Doscore, and plan parameters according to a gamma criterion of 2 %/2 mm (γ2%/2 mm). A nomogram was constructed to combine these signatures with plan parameters. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results:
The combined model incorporating PCscore, Doscore, and plan parameters exhibited high discriminative power, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.894, 0.899, and 0.904 for the training, test, and external datasets, respectively. At γ3%/2 mm, the model maintained robust performance with AUCs of 0.842 and 0.833 in the test and external datasets. Calibration curves and DCA validated the model's effectiveness.
Conclusions:
Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics signatures with key plan parameters significantly improves GPR classification for VMAT treatment plans, offering a robust approach for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA).
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022