Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Predictions from Deep Learning Propose Substantial Protein-Carbohydrate Interplay
Samuel W Canner1, Ronald L Schnaar2,3, Jeffrey J Gray1,4
1Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
None:
It is a grand challenge to identify all the protein - carbohydrate interactions in an organism. Direct experiments would require extensive libraries of glycans to definitively distinguish binding from non-binding proteins. Computational screening of proteins for carbohydrate-binding provides an attractive and ultimately testable alternative. Recent computational techniques have focused primarily on which protein residues interact with carbohydrates or which carbohydrate species a protein binds to. Current estimates label 1.5 to 5% of proteins as carbohydrate-binding proteins; however, 50-70% of proteins are known to be glycosylated, suggesting a potential wealth of proteins that bind to carbohydrates. We therefore developed a novel dataset and neural network architecture, named Protein interaction of Carbohydrates Predictor (PiCAP), to predict whether a protein non-covalently binds to a carbohydrate. We trained PiCAP on a dataset of known carbohydrate binders, and we selected proteins that we identified as likely not to bind carbohydrates, including DNA-binding transcription factors, cytoskeletal components, selected antibodies, and selected small-molecule-binding proteins. PiCAP achieves a 90% balanced accuracy on protein-level predictions of carbohydrate binding/non-binding. Using the same dataset, we developed a model named Carbohydrate Protein Site Identifier 2 (CAPSIF2) to predict protein residues that interact non-covalently with carbohydrates. CAPSIF2 achieves a Dice coefficient of 0.57 on residue-level predictions on our independent test dataset, outcompeting all previous models for this task. To demonstrate the biological applicability of PiCAP and CAPSIF2, we investigated cell surface proteins of human neural cells and further predicted the likelihood of three proteomes, notably E. coli, M. musculus, and H. sapiens, to bind to carbohydrates. PiCAP predicts that approximately 35-40% of proteins in these proteomes bind carbohydrates, indicating a substantial interplay of protein-carbohydrate interactions for cellular functionality.
More Related Videos
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
10:21Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein Organization
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-Protein Interfaces