Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictions from deep learning propose substantial protein-carbohydrate interplay.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The Open Molecular Software Foundation (OMSF) and the Growing Role of Open Source Software in Molecular Modeling.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Fitness Landscape for Antibodies 2: Benchmarking Reveals That Protein AI Models Cannot Yet Consistently Predict Developability Properties.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Can We Extract Physics-like Energies from Generative Protein Diffusion Models?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Adapting Co-Folding Models for Structure-Based Protein-Protein Docking Through Flow Matching.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Docking With Rosetta and Deep Learning Approaches in CAPRI Rounds 47-55.

Proteins·2025
Same journal

A human-specific genetic modifier reconfigures large-scale cortical network dynamics underlying behavioral performance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> uses a eukaryotic-like uridyltransferase to make UDP-GlcNAc for cell wall synthesis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamic redistribution of eIF4F controls cap-dependent translation initiation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

When does additional information improve accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Normative brain-state trajectories reveal deviation from healthy aging in Alzheimer's disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Noradrenergic infraslow rhythm during sleep is the critical link between heart-rate dynamics and memory consolidation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

ProtAff: Protein Binding Affinity Prediction via LoRA-Finetuned ESM-2.

Lee-Shin Chu, Jeff Vogt, Michael Chungyoun

    Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
    |June 22, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    ProtAff, a new sequence-only model, accurately predicts protein-protein interaction binding affinity, outperforming existing structure-based and machine learning methods. This advance aids in designing effective protein binders for therapeutic applications.

    More Related Videos

    A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
    16:41

    A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

    Published on: November 3, 2011

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

    Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
    10:21

    Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

    Published on: February 23, 2024

    A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
    16:41

    A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

    Published on: November 3, 2011

    Area of Science:

    • Computational biology
    • Structural biology
    • Bioinformatics

    Background:

    • Predicting protein-protein interaction (PPI) binding affinity is crucial but challenging.
    • Current structure prediction models like AlphaFold3 (AF3) and Boltz-2 provide good poses but their confidence scores do not correlate with binding affinity.
    • Existing machine learning predictors also struggle with accurate affinity ranking.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a novel, sequence-only computational model for predicting protein-protein interaction binding affinity.
    • To evaluate the performance of the new model against state-of-the-art structure-based and machine learning methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed ProtAff, a sequence-only model using ESM-2 (650M parameters) with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) and a cross-attention module.
    • Trained ProtAff on 362,567 affinity measurements from 20 diverse data sources using a margin ranking loss.
    • Ensured robust evaluation by removing training samples with >50% sequence similarity to test targets (e.g., EGFR).

    Main Results:

    • ProtAff achieved a Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.413 on the AdaptyvBio EGFR benchmark, significantly outperforming AF3 (ρ=0.054), Boltz-2 (ρ=-0.046), MINT (ρ=0.242), and CrossAffinity (ρ=0.216).
    • In a binder design competition for Nipah virus, ProtAff-guided design yielded a binder with KD=0.132 nM, a 2.8-fold improvement over the winner.
    • ProtAff showed limitations in cross-target discrimination, underperforming structural methods for distinguishing cognate from non-cognate pairings.

    Conclusions:

    • Sequence-based models like ProtAff are highly effective for ranking binding affinity within a specific target.
    • While ProtAff excels at affinity prediction, structural methods remain superior for assessing cross-target specificity.
    • ProtAff represents a significant advancement in computational prediction of protein-protein interaction binding affinity, with potential applications in drug discovery and protein engineering.