Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
Investigations for diagnosis of secondary hypertension in children: yield and costs
Stefano Guarino1, Paola Tirelli1, Anna Di Sessa1
1Department of Woman, Child and of General and Specialized Surgery, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luigi De Crecchio 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Insights
A focused diagnostic work-up effectively screens for secondary hypertension in children, identifying kidney disease as a common cause. This approach is more cost-effective than extensive screening, ensuring accurate diagnoses.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Screening for secondary hypertension in children is crucial, though not universally recommended.
- Identifying secondary causes of hypertension is critical to prevent long-term complications.
- Current diagnostic protocols vary, necessitating evaluation of their effectiveness and cost.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the causes of hypertension in a cohort of pediatric patients.
- To determine the costs and diagnostic contributions of an extended work-up for secondary hypertension.
- To compare the performance and costs of a "short diagnostic work-up" against established American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) protocols.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, single-center study involving 70 hypertensive children (aged 1-18 years).
- All patients underwent an extended diagnostic work-up to identify secondary hypertension causes.
- Performance and costs of a short work-up (including kidney ultrasound and Doppler) were compared with AAP and ESH guidelines.
Main Results:
- Secondary hypertension was identified in 41.4% of patients, with kidney parenchymal disease being the most frequent cause.
- A short work-up and the ESH protocol successfully identified all secondary hypertension cases.
- The AAP protocol missed 15 diagnoses, while the extended protocol incurred significant costs (€253.08 per patient).
Conclusions:
- Primary hypertension is more prevalent than secondary hypertension in children.
- A simplified, focused diagnostic work-up is a cost-effective strategy for screening secondary hypertension in pediatric patients.
- Kidney parenchymal disease is the leading secondary cause of hypertension in children, highlighting the importance of renal evaluation.
Background:
Screening for secondary hypertension is not recommended for all hypertensive patients, but missing these cases is critical. We aimed to (i) assess hypertension causes in a cohort of hypertensive children, (ii) determine the costs and contributions of an extended diagnostic work-up to screen for secondary hypertension, and (iii) compare the performance of a "short diagnostic work-up" with the protocols of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH).
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 70 hypertensive patients aged 1-18 years. All underwent an extended work-up to exclude secondary hypertension. Diagnostic findings, test counts, and costs were analyzed. A short work-up (serum creatinine, fasting glucose, electrolytes, urinalysis, kidney ultrasound (US), and renal artery Doppler US), as well as the AAP and ESH protocols, was evaluated for performance and costs.
Results:
Secondary hypertension was identified in 29 patients (41.4%). The extended protocol identified or excluded secondary causes in all patients. Kidney US had the highest diagnostic yield (37.1%). The short work-up and ESH protocol identified all secondary cases, whereas the AAP protocol missed 15 diagnoses. The extended protocol cost € 17,715.60 (€ 253.08 per patient). Direct cost savings were 64.3% with the short work-up, 92.4% with the AAP protocol, and 76.2% with the ESH protocol.
Conclusions:
Primary is more common than secondary hypertension in children, with kidney parenchymal disease being the leading secondary cause. As recommended by guidelines, a simplified, focused work-up may offer a cost-effective alternative to extensive screening while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
04:37Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure