Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Developing a quality indicator system for pediatric clinical trials management of research centers in China: a
1Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Children's Hospital, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, No.2 Yabao Road, Beijing, 100020, China. liuchangpumc@163.com.
Insights
This study developed a risk assessment index system to improve pediatric clinical trial management in research centers. The system provides a framework for quality control and risk management in pediatric drug development.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- Pediatric Pharmacology
- Quality Management Systems
Background:
- Pediatric clinical trials face significant challenges impacting drug development safety and efficacy.
- Existing risk management research primarily focuses on sponsors, neglecting research center perspectives.
- A systematic, expert-validated risk-based management system for pediatric trials in institutions is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a risk assessment index system for enhancing the quality of pediatric clinical trial management within research centers.
- To establish an expert consensus on a risk-based quality system for pediatric clinical trials in China.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Delphi-analytic hierarchy process for expert consultation with 20 experienced professionals in pediatric clinical trials across China.
- Employed criteria such as mean value, expert full marks proportion, and variation coefficient for indicator inclusion.
- Determined indicator weights using the analytic hierarchy process.
Main Results:
- Achieved high expert response rates (100%) and credibility (95% positive coefficients, 0.885-0.892 authoritative coefficients).
- The resulting quality management system comprises four primary, sixteen secondary, and thirty-two tertiary indicators.
- Protocol design (0.3741) and subject protection (0.3148) received the highest weights, followed by process management (0.1879) and data collection (0.1232).
Conclusions:
- A systematic, expert-validated risk-based quality system for managing pediatric clinical trials in Chinese research centers has been established.
- The framework identifies key risk indicators, offering a reference for quality control and internal audits.
- Further research is needed to evaluate the system's practical implementation and adaptability.
Background:
Pediatric clinical trials face many challenges that hinder the development of safe and effective pediatric drugs. Enhancing risk control and management quality of pediatric clinical trials in research centers is essential to address these challenges. While existing studies focus on risk management from the perspective of sponsors, research specifically addressing risk management strategies in research centers is limited. There is a lack of systematic exploration and expert consensus on risk-based management system of pediatric trials for institutions. This study seeks to fill this gap by developing a risk assessment index system designed to enhance the management quality of pediatric clinical trials in research centers. The system is built upon a theoretical framework that integrates insights from experts across various domains of pediatric clinical trials.
Methods:
The Delphi-analytic hierarchy process method was used for expert consultation to develop a risk assessment index system in pediatric clinical trials management of research centers. The questionnaire was distributed to 20 experts with extensive experience in pediatric clinical trials. These experts were selected from various regions and work units across China. Experts with more than 5 years of working experience and bachelor degree or above were included for consultation. The mean value, proportion of experts with full marks, and variation coefficient of important score and feasibility score of the indicators were applied to include the indexes. The analytic hierarchy process was used to investigate the weight of each indicator.
Results:
The consultation outcomes exhibited good response rate and credibility, the experts' positive coefficients were 100% and 95%, respectively, and the authoritative coefficients were 0.885 and 0.892. The final quality management indicator system for research centers consisted of four primary, sixteen secondary, and thirty-two tertiary indicators. Protocol design and subject protection accounted for the highest weight of 0.3741 and 0.3148 respectively in the index system, and next came process management and data collection of 0.1879 and 0.1232 in quality management of pediatric clinical trials.
Conclusions:
This study develops a systematic expert consensus on a risk-based quality system tailored to the management of pediatric clinical trials in domestic research centers. The framework identifies critical risk indicators in the management process, providing a potential reference for quality control and internal audits within pediatric clinical trial research centers in China. However, further research is required to assess its practical implementation and adaptability to diverse trial conditions.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...