Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

546
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
546
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

58
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
58
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

72
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
72
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.7K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.7K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

2.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
2.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

106
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
106

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

GRADE Guidance: Update on Developing Good Practice Statements in Guidelines.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Converting Evidence-Based Summary of Findings Evidence Tables Into Decision Analytical, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and Life Expectancies Metrics: A Tutorial.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025
Same author

What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2024
Same author

Improving methods of clinical practice guidelines: From guidelines to pathways to fast-and-frugal trees and decision analysis to develop individualised patient care.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2023
Same author

Decision curve analysis based on summary data.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2023
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
05:35

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management

Published on: January 19, 2024

688

Improving Guideline Development Processes: Integrating Evidence Estimation and Decision-Analytical Frameworks.

Benjamin Djulbegovic1, Iztok Hozo2, Ilkka Kunnamo3

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|April 1, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a transparent decision-analysis model to improve clinical guideline development. By integrating evidence from Summary of Findings tables, it enhances the trustworthiness of health intervention recommendations.

Keywords:
Bayesian statisticsGRADEdecision analysesdecision‐makingevidence‐based medicinefrequentist statisticsguidelinesinferences

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
05:35

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management

Published on: January 19, 2024

688
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Health policy and research methodology
  • Clinical decision-making and evidence synthesis

Background:

  • Current guideline development, including the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, relies on intuitive evidence integration by panels.
  • This reliance creates 'black-box' and 'integration' problems, reducing transparency and trustworthiness in clinical practice guidelines.
  • The limited human capacity to process extensive data in Summary of Findings (SoF) tables exacerbates these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the 'black-box' and 'integration' problems in guideline development.
  • To propose a transparent and analytical method for integrating evidence from SoF tables into decision-making.
  • To enhance the trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines through a novel approach.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraged the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) format as a basis for deriving SoF tables.
  • Integrated frequentist or Bayesian estimates from SoF tables with decision analysis, considering intervention consequences.
  • Matched PICO-based SoF tables with decision models to calculate the net difference in expected utility (ΔEU) for competing interventions.

Main Results:

  • Successfully connected the PICO framework to decision-analytical models to calculate ΔEU, a single metric for comparing interventions.
  • The ΔEU metric provided a simple, transparent, and understandable assessment of competing management strategies across multiple outcomes.
  • Decision models based on ΔEU can be completed in approximately 10 minutes, offering a rapid and efficient analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating straightforward and transparent decision modeling (ΔEU) into guideline panels' processes enhances intuitive judgments.
  • This approach leads to more trustworthy recommendations by addressing the limitations of current evidence integration methods.
  • Advocates for the immediate inclusion of ΔEU calculation in systematic reviews and SoF tables to improve guideline quality.