Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Autoradiography as a Simple and Powerful Method for Visualization and Characterization of Pharmacological Targets
Published on: March 12, 2019
Autoradiographic comparison between [11C]PiB and [18F]AZD4694 in human brain tissue
Antonio Aliaga1,2,3, Joseph Therriault1,4,5, Kely Quispialaya1,3,5,6
1Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, 6875 La Salle Blvd - FBC Room 3149, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.
Background:
Amyloid-β imaging through positron emission tomography (PET) has significantly transformed Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. [11C]PiB has been widely used for imaging β-amyloid plaques due to its high affinity and selectivity for amyloid deposits. [18F]AZD4694 is a more recently developed amyloid-PET imaging agent, which structurally resembles PiB and has less non-specific binding in the white matter than other 18F-labeled compounds. The purpose of this study is to compare the in vitro binding properties of the amyloid-PET radiotracers [11C]PiB and [18F]AZD4694 in post-mortem human brain tissue. Total binding was assessed by autoradiography in prefrontal, inferior parietal, posterior cingulate cortices and hippocampal sections of healthy control (HC) and AD autopsy-confirmed brain tissues. Furthermore, the displacement of [18F]AZD4694 by unlabeled PiB was evaluated in the above-mentioned sections of AD brain tissues.
Results:
For both radiotracers, we found significant differences (p < 0.0001) between HC and AD tissues binding in the prefrontal cortex ([11C]PiB Cohen's d = 3.424, [18F]AZD4694 Cohen's d = 5.070), inferior parietal cortex ([11C]PiB Cohen's d = 3.156, [18F]AZD4694 Cohen's d = 3.959), posterior cingulate cortex ([11C]PiB Cohen's d = 1.781, [18F]AZD4694 Cohen's d = 3.434), and hippocampus ([11C]PiB Cohen's d = 1.320, [18F]AZD4694 Cohen's d = 3.696). Higher binding was detected for [18F]AZD4694 compared to [11C]PiB in AD prefrontal, inferior parietal and posterior cingulate cortices, while binding in the hippocampus was comparable for both radioligands. Strong correlations between [18]AZD4694 and [11C]PiB were found in the prefrontal (R = 0.959, p < 0.0001), inferior parietal (R = 0.893, p < 0.0001), posterior cingulate (R = 0.838, p = 0.0006) cortices and hippocampus (R = 0.750, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analyses revealed strong agreement between [11C]PiB and [18F]AZD4694 in the prefrontal, inferior parietal, and posterior cingulate cortices, but lower agreement in the hippocampus. Displacement studies confirmed high binding affinity of PiB in all tissues, indicating that both amyloid-PET agents compete for the same binding sites.
Conclusions:
This head-to-head study provides evidence that while [18F]AZD4694 and [11C]PiB bindings are highly correlated with both tracers competing for the same binding sites, [18F]AZD4694 has a slightly higher effect size when comparing between neuropathologically-confirmed AD and HC brain tissues.
Related Concept Videos
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
X-ray Imaging

