Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

06:49
A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
Published on: October 6, 2015
19.5K
Time-to-event prediction in ALS using a landmark modeling approach, using the ALS Natural History Consortium dataset
David Schneck1,2, Andres Arguedas3, Annette Xenopoulos-Oddsson1,2
1Analytics Hub, University of Minnesota Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Summary
We developed dynamic prediction models for key events in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) progression, aiding clinical trial design and personal patient planning. These models offer individualized risk predictions for ALS disease progression events.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Clinically relevant time-to-event outcomes are crucial in observational and interventional studies for diseases like Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
- Several key clinical events mark ALS progression, necessitating accurate prediction for patient management and research.
- Dynamic prediction models can enhance the utility of time-to-event data in ALS research and clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate dynamic prediction models for clinically relevant time-to-event outcomes in ALS.
- To enable personalized risk prediction for individual ALS patients.
- To provide tools for improved clinical trial modeling and patient planning in ALS.
Main Methods:
- Landmark time-to-event analysis was applied to longitudinal data from 1557 ALS participants.
- Five ALS progression events were modeled: loss of ambulation, speech, gastrostomy, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use, and continuous NIV use.
- Models incorporated covariates such as age at diagnosis, sex, onset, riluzole use, diagnostic delay, and ALSFRS-R scores/rates of change, with internal and external validation.
Main Results:
- Dynamic prediction models were created for multiple ALS time-to-event outcomes.
- Risk prediction intervals were generated for patient subgroups and individual predictions.
- Models demonstrated good concordance and performance, with time to loss of speech models showing the best validation metrics.
Conclusions:
- Landmarking provides an efficient, individualized risk prediction method for ALS.
- These models are valuable for clinical trial design, personal patient planning, and generating real-world evidence on treatment impacts.

