Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Importance of Jumping Ability in Handball Throwing Speed and Accuracy
Published on: April 4, 2025
Relationship between maximal jumping height in pole vault and the approach-run velocity evaluated by digitising
F Kobayashi1, A Noro2, S Hatakeyama1
1Faculty of Sport Science, Nippon Sport Science University, Yokohama, Japan.
Validating pole vaulting approach-run velocity measurements is crucial. The body-only digitizing method showed minimal bias, offering a reliable way to assess speed and its impact on jump height.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Athletic Performance Analysis
Background:
- Accurate measurement of approach-run velocity is vital for understanding pole vaulting performance.
- Previous methods for calculating velocity, such as body-only digitizing and laser displacement, have varying degrees of accuracy.
- Comparing these methods against a whole-system approach is essential for validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate approach-run velocities from body-only and laser methods against a whole-system method in pole vaulting.
- To determine the relationship between different velocity measurement methods and maximal centre of mass (COM) height during clearance.
- To assess the impact of velocity measurement techniques on the correlation with jumping performance.
Main Methods:
- Eighteen male pole vaulters performed 96 attempts in outdoor competitions.
- Approach-run velocities were measured using body-only digitizing, laser displacement, and a whole-system method.
- Bland-Altman plots were used to assess bias and agreement between methods.
- The association between approach-run velocity and maximal COM height was analyzed.
Main Results:
- The peak approach-run velocity from the body-only method exhibited negligible bias compared to the whole-system method.
- Other parameters from body-only digitizing and laser methods showed significant errors.
- A strong positive correlation was found between peak approach-run velocity and maximal COM height across all methods.
- The relationship between maximal COM height and decreased approach-run velocity was stronger for digitizing methods than the laser method.
Conclusions:
- The body-only digitizing method provides a reliable estimate of peak approach-run velocity in pole vaulting.
- Conventional digitizing and laser methods require careful application due to potential biases and errors.
- While peak velocity strongly correlates with jump height, the relationship with velocity decrease varies by measurement method, impacting performance analysis.
More Related Videos
10:28Kinematics and Ground Reaction Force Determination: A Demonstration Quantifying Locomotor Abilities of Young Adult, Middle-aged, and Geriatric Rats
Published on: February 22, 2011
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Impact: Problem Solving
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving
Projectile Motion: Example
When we speak of the range (R) of a projectile on...
Velocity Potential
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...