Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
Published on: February 10, 2015
Inter-system differences in modelling approaches for shoulder joint kinematics between markerless and marker-based
Tomoya Uchida1, Tomoyuki Matsuo2, Takuya Nakamura2,3
1Toyota Athlete Support Centre, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Toyota, Japan.
Markerless motion capture systems show notable differences compared to marker-based systems for shoulder kinematics in baseball pitching. Understanding these discrepancies is crucial for accurate analysis of overhead athletes.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Motion Capture Technology
Background:
- Markerless motion capture systems offer potential advantages for analyzing high-speed movements.
- Limited comparative data exists for upper-extremity kinematics using markerless systems versus traditional marker-based methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare shoulder joint kinematics between a markerless system (Theia3D) and a marker-based system during baseball pitching.
- To identify inter-system modeling differences in shoulder angles and joint center positions.
Main Methods:
- Simultaneous recording of six collegiate pitchers during 117 baseball pitching trials using both markerless and marker-based systems.
- Analysis using nested Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and statistical parametric mapping (SPM).
Main Results:
- Small differences at maximum external rotation (MER) for external rotation (ICC=0.77), but significant bias in horizontal angle (-19.1°).
- Increased inter-system differences at ball release (BR), particularly for external rotation (ICC=0.33), with proportional bias observed.
- Statistical parametric mapping revealed significant differences during the acceleration phase.
Conclusions:
- Markerless and marker-based systems exhibit notable discrepancies in shoulder kinematics during baseball pitching, especially at ball release.
- Participant-specific offsets contribute to agreement limits, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of markerless data.
- Understanding system-specific characteristics is vital for applying markerless motion capture in overhead athletes.
Related Concept Videos
Kinematic Equations for Rotation
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...
Kinematic Equations - II
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
Kinematic Equations - I
Kinematic Equations - III
Using the kinematic equations,...
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the drone...
