Low-dose tin-filtered computed tomography (CT) with iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm versus dual-energy
Ruixin Yan1, Siyuan Qin1, Yana Dou2
1Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate a low-dose tin-filtered (LD Sn) CT protocol with iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) to reduce metal artifacts and radiation dose compared to dual-energy CT (DECT) with iMAR in patients with lumbar metal implants.
Methods:
The study included 70 patients, comprising 35 patients in the prospective LD Sn CT cohort and 35 matched patients in the retrospective DECT cohort, utilizing a hybrid design. Evaluations included DECT Mixed images, noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic imaging at 130 keV (DE Mono+), and LD Sn CT with and without iMAR. Objective assessments included the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM). A 5-point scoring system was used for subjective evaluations of image quality, including overall image quality, soft tissue visualization, bone architecture, and the degree of metal artifacts. Radiation dose metrics, including CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and effective dose (ED), were recorded.
Results:
The LD Sn CT protocol achieved a 26 % lower effective dose than the DECT protocol (7.34 ± 1.45 mSv vs. 9.93 ± 2.00 mSv, P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in SNR, CNR, or FOM between LD Sn and DE Mono+ (P = 0.238-0.310). Subjective assessments, including overall image quality, soft tissue visualization, bone architecture, and the degree of metal artifact, showed slight differences without statistical significance. LD Sn iMAR scores ranged from 2.00 to 2.11, while DE Mono+ iMAR scores ranged from 1.83 to 2.00 (P = 0.120-0.763).
Conclusions:
The LD Sn iMAR protocol achieved the optimal balance between image quality and radiation dose. It is recommended for routine follow-up in patients with lumbar implants.
More Related Videos
07:48High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue
Published on: September 30, 2022
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:24Magnetic Resonance Imaging