Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Blood Flow Imaging with Ultrafast Doppler
Published on: October 14, 2020
Velocity-selective arterial spin labelling bolus duration measurements: Implications for consensus recommendations
Ian D Driver1,2, Hannah L Chandler1,2, Eleonora Patitucci2
1Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Velocity-selective arterial spin labelling (VSASL) MRI is insensitive to prolonged arterial transit time. This is an advantage over other arterial spin labelling schemes, where long arterial transit times can lead to bias. Therefore, VSASL can be used with greater confidence to study perfusion in the presence of long arterial transit times, such as in the ageing brain, in vascular pathologies, and cancer, or where arterial transit time changes, such as during measurement of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). However, when calculating perfusion (cerebral blood flow, CBF, in the brain) from VSASL signal, it is assumed that a vascular crushing module, defining the duration of the bolus, is applied before the arrival of the trailing edge. The early arrival of the trailing edge of the labelled bolus of blood will cause an underestimation of perfusion. Here we measure bolus duration in adult, healthy human brains, both at rest and during elevated CBF during CO2 breathing (5% inspired CO2). Grey matter bolus duration was of 2.20 ± 0.35 s / 2.22 ± 0.53 s / 2.05 ± 0.34 s (2/3/4 cm/s vcutoff) at rest, in close agreement with a prior investigation. However, we observed a significant decrease in bolus duration during hypercapnia, and a matched reduction in CVR above a labelling delay of approximately 1.2 s. The reduction in CVR and bolus duration was spatially heterogenous, with shorter hypercapnic bolus durations observed in the frontal lobe (1.31 ± 0.54 s) and temporal lobes (1.36 ± 0.24 s), compared to the occipital lobe (1.50 ± 0.26 s). We place these results in context of recommendations from a recent consensus paper, which recommends imaging 1.4 s after the label, which could lead to CBF underestimation in conditions with fast flow or during CVR measurements. These results can be used to inform the experimental design of future VSASL studies, to avoid underestimating perfusion by imaging after the arrival of the trailing edge of the labelled bolus.
More Related Videos
12:29Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
08:26Quantitative Mapping of Specific Ventilation in the Human Lung using Proton Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Oxygen as a Contrast Agent
Published on: June 5, 2019