Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

A Method to Study the C924T Polymorphism of the Thromboxane A2 Receptor Gene
Published on: April 1, 2019
The Impact of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Other Mechanisms on Aspirin Resistance
Natalia Sergeevna Nuzhdina1, Aleksei Vitalievich Kurguzov1, David Sergeevich Sergeevichev1
1E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rechkunovskaya Str., 15, 630055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Insights
Aspirin resistance (AR) varies widely, impacting treatment effectiveness for cardiovascular diseases. Genetic variations (SNPs) in key genes may explain inconsistent responses to antiplatelet therapy, necessitating careful interpretation of genotyping results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacogenomics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Atherosclerosis and ischemic events are central to cardiovascular diseases (CVD).
- Antiplatelet agents are crucial for preventing thrombosis post-cardiovascular surgery.
- Current aspirin and dual antiplatelet therapies show controversial effectiveness, with some patients exhibiting aspirin resistance (AR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review scientific literature on detecting and genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes related to aspirin's therapeutic targets.
- To explore the association between SNPs and aspirin resistance (AR) or high platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on experimental detection and genotyping of SNPs.
- Analysis of SNPs in key therapeutic target genes: COX-1, COX-2, GUCY1A3, GPIIb-IIIa, and PEAR1.
- Examination of SNP distribution in patients with IHD and control groups.
Main Results:
- Aspirin resistance (AR) prevalence ranges from 0% to 66% in IHD patients and controls.
- SNP analysis is proposed to explain high platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients on aspirin therapy.
- The efficacy of aspirin in secondary thrombosis prevention is not strongly linked to known SNPs, with inconsistent clinical trial results.
Conclusions:
- The inconsistent efficacy of aspirin therapy in preventing recurrent cardiovascular thrombotic events may be linked to genetic variations (SNPs).
- Methodological and quantitative issues in clinical trials contribute to conflicting results regarding AR and SNPs.
- Careful interpretation of SNP genotyping is essential for understanding aspirin's effectiveness in CVD patients.
Abstract:
Atherosclerosis and ischemic events play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of several cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The primary aim of preventing recurrent thrombosis in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery is the antiplatelet agent administration. Nevertheless, despite the aspirin therapy or double (aspirin plus clopidogrel) therapy, the effectiveness of antithrombotic treatment remains controversial. In recent years, we have learned that some percentage of patients still demonstrate no clinical response to aspirin treatment and may experience a vascular complication. This article provides an overview of recent scientific studies that have focused on experimental detection and genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in patients, involving the main therapeutic target genes: cyclooxygenase COX-1 and COX-2, guanylate cyclase GUCY1A3, the glycoprotein complex GPIIb-IIIa, and the platelet receptor protein PEAR1." The aspirin resistance (AR) ranges considerably from 0 % to 66% in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and relatively healthy people (control group). SNP distribution analysis has been proposed to explain the inadequate high platelet reactivity (HPR) among patients with IHD under aspirin treatment. Various SNPs have been proposed to explain the development of CVD and the persistent HPR under aspirin treatment widely used in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular thrombotic events. Meanwhile, the efficacy of aspirin therapy in secondary thrombosis prevention in patients with IHD is not strongly associated with known SNP. The inconsistent results of different AR clinical trials are likely due to the design of the experiments and methodological and quantitative issues; therefore, careful interpretation of the SNP genotyping results is necessary.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug Interactions
Displacement interactions can have varying outcomes, ranging from toxicity to virtually...
Factors Affecting Drug Biotransformation: Biological
Species differences: Variations in enzyme systems across species can cause disparities in drug metabolism. For instance, humans may metabolize certain drugs faster than rodents, altering therapeutic effects.
Strain differences: Genetic variations within a species can result in differing enzyme activity, impacting drug response and toxicity. For example, some mouse strains may...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Genome Copying Errors

