Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Tensions regarding inclusion meanings from stakeholders' perspectives: A qualitative study
María-José Solis-Grant1, María-José Bretti-López2, Cristóbal Sepúlveda-Carrasco3
1Departamento de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Biobío, Chile.
Abstract:
In literature, a divergence is apparent concerning the definition of educational inclusion. The study aims to describe the relationship between the diversity of actors in the university community and their perception of institutional inclusion in higher education organizations in Chile. We employed a qualitative methodology based on Grounded Theory, conducting focus groups with 16 students, 17 teachers, five non-teaching staff, and eight authorities. We conducted a semi-structured interview with an authority, encompassing all three university campuses in the country. The data analysis revealed five subcategories associated with the topic. What is understood by the concept of inclusion? What do they think about inclusion? Who should be the subjects of inclusion? What changes have been observed in inclusion? Moreover, why is it necessary to define inclusion? The emphasis is on the diverse existing views around the approach to the concept and the need to generate definitions with institutional relevance to advance its development and implementation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
In- and Out-Groups
Stereotype Content Model
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Ethics in Research

