Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

100
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
100
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

231
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
231

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability, bias, and computational cost of estimating the Bayes factor using bridge sampling and the Savage-Dickey density ratio.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

How is free time used in complex span tasks?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Does the benefit of time for working memory arise at encoding or retrieval?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Revisiting the retro-cue benefit: Why does focusing attention result in improved memory performance?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Forget For Now, but Remember Later: Can People Selectively Remove Information From Working Memory While Keeping it in Long-Term Memory?

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K

Susceptibility to visual interference in working memory: Different results depending on the prioritization mode?

Caro Hautekiet1, Marcel Niklaus1, Klaus Oberauer1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Zurich.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Prioritizing items in working memory doesn't consistently protect them from interference. This study found that memory items, regardless of priority or cue type, showed similar vulnerability to visual interference.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Working Memory Research

Background:

  • Working memory allows prioritized item selection via attention.
  • Conflicting findings exist: some studies show prioritized items are protected from interference, while others show they are vulnerable.
  • Divergent methodologies, such as retro-cues versus serial position effects, may explain these discrepancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether different prioritization modes in working memory lead to opposing effects on interference vulnerability.
  • To reconcile conflicting findings regarding the protective or vulnerable nature of prioritized information in working memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants memorized sequences of colored shapes.
  • Visual interference stimuli were presented after the last list item.
  • Memory recall was probed, with prioritization indicated by retro-cues or precues in different experimental conditions.

Main Results:

  • Limited evidence suggested the last-presented item might be vulnerable to interference under specific conditions.
  • Overall, memory items demonstrated equal vulnerability to visual interference, irrespective of their priority status.
  • The specific prioritization mode (retro-cue vs. precue) did not significantly alter interference vulnerability.

Conclusions:

  • Prioritization in working memory, using common experimental paradigms, does not consistently confer protection against visual interference.
  • The observed vulnerability of prioritized items appears context-dependent rather than a general phenomenon.
  • Future research should explore the nuanced interactions between attention, memory prioritization, and interference.